loosebits:Walter, from what I know of your experience, I'd trust you to bring me up from 150' buddy breathing in zero viz. However I think we can all agree that many divers out there need a fool proof system with as little complications as possible. I don't think the Air2 qualifies as that.
If I had to be OOA, I guess Walter would be one of the divers I'd like to have around but you'll forgive me if I same some of my own air for the ascent anyway? LOL
I think that simple, streamlined, mistaked-proofed and well rehersed procedures (especially emergency procedures) are a good idea for everybody.
I look at it this way. What's the selling point of an air2? ok, it gets rid of a hose but the hose, nicely routed isn't a problem. I don't need to get rid of it.
Now, what does getting rid of the hose cost? What else does it effect? The end result is that I want to maximize the reliability of my procedures.
I see absolutely no logical reason to tie my backup reg and my inflator together. I don't see any advantage but I do see several "potential" disadvantages. So, I keep my backup reg and my inflator, (which have completely unrelated functions) independant.
Edit: Just to add something. In system design we have a couple of terms we use, "Coupling" and "cohesion". In short, we group related components and procedures together and try to avoid complicating interdependancies where none are needed. The uneeded interdependancies are a real problem because a change to one component or procedure can effect other component or procedures in what that aren't intended and my not even be easy to predict. The easiest way to avoid that is to just not hook them together. In that light, why would I want the use or condition of my backup reg to have any effect on the function of my inflator? I wouldn't. How do I manage that. I just don't tie them together.