Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 185,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Ok, so this is a split from a post DCBC made in a current thread about diving education today.
Originally Posted by DCBC
This is why some Instructors (including myself) don't teach primary donation. It breaks the first rule of every major water-rescue agency: Never put yourself in danger. As soon as you give up the primary, it's a turkey shoot.
It may also coincide well (or perhaps repeat) the current hullabaloo about BSAC's stance on Primary Take (which I can only read as Primary donation) which is also featured in debate on this forum.
Anyhow, my question is this: I've just started doing the long hose, primary donation necklaced backup and thus far I love it. I've even needed to donate which was helpful. The primary drivers for me changing to this config were:
1. I wanted miflex hoses as mine were rigid and pulling my reg out of my mouth
2. I wanted some space capacity in the event of an OOG/LOG situation
3. Last but not least, I have always believed that the location of a non-standard attachment mechanism for the backup is a death trap (sorry for dramatic language). In buddy checks on many occasions I haven't been able to release the octo on first attempt. Bad news. And if someone takes my primary, my octo was rarely in good view point so I would need to retrieve by feel (and hope it was where I put it in the first place). Essentially I saw this aspect of having a safe second not very well designed and not terribly safe.
So I've tried out an alternative rigging that has significant following on this board. So far, perhaps unsurprisingly given the participants, I haven't come across any good arguments against long hose, primary donation, necklaced backup. But DCBC's opinion I respect and he has mentioned that he thinks it a bad idea. Rather than hijack his thread I've started a new one.
So what are the downsides to long hose/primary donation/necklaced backup.
So what are the downsides to long hose/primary donation/necklaced backup.
Gear entaglement. When you start adding things like can lights and stage bottles, there is the added complexity of ensuring that the light cord doesn't get tangled with the long hose, and that you don't trap the long hose when unclipping/clipping stage bottles.
Gear entaglement. When you start adding things like can lights and stage bottles, there is the added complexity of ensuring that the light cord doesn't get tangled with the long hose, and that you don't trap the long hose when unclipping/clipping stage bottles.
I can't think of any other downsides.
Well here's my started for two then too
#1: Easier to get wrong when kitting up (I got my primary release trapped by placing my backup on top of it). Easily checked and resolved by a quick S-drill prior to getting in the water.
#2: my necklace is too short so to look directly down I've had to move my backup sideways to allow space for my primary. A minor annoyance and easily resolved with a longer necklace.
#3: Gotta remember to clip second once out
#4: Gotta remember to remove necklace when de-kitting (although if you don't you will be sharply reminded!).
Nothing their that I think compares to the downsides of 'standard' solutions but still minor downsides or quirks.
It may also coincide well (or perhaps repeat) the current hullabaloo about BSAC's stance on Primary Take (which I can only read as Primary donation) which is also featured in debate on this forum.
No, BSAC allows teaching of primary donation, but not primary take. They're different concepts as at higher levels of training you're expected to have it together enough to ask for air rather than snatch it if you run out. That is the difference.
Basically you have to make sure the hose doesn't get trapped, that's the main downside to me.
Experto credite
I am sure that SAS in the real world is a nice normal 26 year old; not a sex crazed flaming liberal weird experimental socialist leftie drongo