Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
  • Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.

All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

NEW for 2014 Access SBlogbook for members. It allows you to directly upload data from your dive computer, validate your logs digitally, link your dives to photos, videos, dive centers (9,000 on file), fishes (14,000 on file) and much more.

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Any good source for 16inch tower, chamber

 

  1. #1
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,974
    Photos
    133

    Any good source for 16inch tower, chamber

    I am looking for 16inch tower (chamber) for the portable filtration project.

    Please let me know if you have any good source.

    I prefer the used one though...

    Thanks in advance,
    Safe dive!
    Hoosier

  2. #2
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    350
    Dives
    1,000 - 1,999
    Photos
    3
    Hoosier,

    I have new Bauer type filter (16in) chambers for $486 plus shipping
    Jim

  3. #3
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,974
    Photos
    133
    Jim,

    I know where I can get the new one... It is about the same price range, even at eBay....

    I would like to get the used one first..
    Safe dive!
    Hoosier

  4. #4
    Registered


    Compressor Fixer
     

    CraigAClark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pembroke Pines, FL
    Posts
    469
    Dives
    I'm a Fish!
    Unless "used" filtration is attached to a compressor, you will not likely be able to verify the cycles it has seen. Since filtration towers are subject to a life span of cycles, I don't think it is a good idea to purchase used filtration, unless there is a verifiable history.

    Craig

  5. #5
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,974
    Photos
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigAClark View Post
    Unless "used" filtration is attached to a compressor, you will not likely be able to verify the cycles it has seen. Since filtration towers are subject to a life span of cycles, I don't think it is a good idea to purchase used filtration, unless there is a verifiable history.

    Craig

    Thanks for your comment. I haven't thought about that...

    So, what is a typical life span of the tower/chamber?

    As you may guess, I plan to use this one ONLY for the portable purpose. Whenever I go somewhere (NOT U.S.) I can't trust an air source, I plan to hook it up right before my tank inlet. Therefore, it won't be used that much compared to my static filtration system.

    The main reason that I am looking for 16inch & lighter unit is its dimension. I would like to put it into the pelican case.
    Safe dive!
    Hoosier

  6. #6
    Equipment Manufacturer


    Actually a
    "Distributor" ...
    Not a manufacturer
     

    rcontrera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    670
    You need one of these then.



    It is a standard Coltri tower with yoke inlet and outlet.
    Ray
    ===================
    www.CompressorStuff.com
    Providing Compressors and Accessories since 1981
    Beat the April 1st Coltri price increase by ordering NOW!


  7. #7
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,974
    Photos
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by rcontrera View Post
    You need one of these then.



    It is a standard Coltri tower with yoke inlet and outlet.

    Ray,,, I know yours. But, I am lazy so that I am looking for something that has a relatively longer filter life....
    Safe dive!
    Hoosier

  8. #8
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Loughborough England UK
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier View Post
    Thanks for your comment. I haven't thought about that...

    So, what is a typical life span of the tower/chamber? EDIT.
    I think this is based on problems and some explosions of older pressure chambers built by Bauer and others that used a lower stress grade aluminium material and a lower 2.5:1 pressure to bust calculation rather than say the ASME 4:1 working pressure to burst ratio.

    So an old Bauer shell could have been made from 6061 or 6062 material and if built under TUV approvals only have a 2.5:1 WP to burst, (2 1/2 to 1) they also had on there separators a very high stress riser by using a sharp undercut on the thread lead out, that led to a number of explosions.

    The modern Bauer shells have a much greater radius on the thread lead out and are made from 7075 material so are now also 4:1 as far as WP to burst pressure, the same as most other modern filter shells.

    A lot of US fire departments got rid of their old Bauer shells so some of these do appear on E-bay from time to time and the like. As well as a number of oddball pressure accumulators and various cobbled together pressure bladders of low quality and poor trace ability. The trick is to know the difference.

    Filter life over in Europe for all filters including Bauer is based on pressure cycles and pressure reversals, so a filter going from 150 barg to 350 barg (2175 psig to 5000psig) as a chemical dehydrator will last longer by calculation than say a water separator that is going from zero pressure to full working pressure and back again 3 times an hour. Separator life is reduced by the pressure cycle in some cases at 3-4 cycles per hour on auto dump systems. 15 years life is common in Europe.

  9. #9
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Loughborough England UK
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by rcontrera View Post
    You need one of these then.



    It is a standard Coltri tower with yoke inlet and outlet.

    This is just more smoke and mirror rubbish. All the test results from these “personal filters” has ranged from grossly inadequate to totally useless for a number of reasons.
    Most of their problems are based on dwell time and gas velocity, resulting granted in some alterations to the outlet spigot hole diameter to reduce flow velocity in some later variants.

    However with these “personnel filters” from Coltri et al the basic idea is only to “polish” air that is already up to a breathing air standard, there is no capacity to handle air from a compressor that has failed air purity. Further there is no BPR back-pressure regulator and non-return valve so the shell is in effect filled and discharged of pressure very rapidly at each and every fill. When not in use the shell is stored empty of pressure, allowing the chemical to rapidly degrade.

    This causes two detrimental effects:
    1. It breaks down the chemical into powder or dust by the rapid decompression
    2. The lack of a BPR reduces the already inadequate amount of chemical to adsorb
    3. Coltri et al the suppliers fail to address the fact that oil particulate is adsorbed not absorbed so dirty long chain hydrocarbons adsorbed by the new chemical are simply desorbed back out into the next cylinder being charged.

    The advantages of using the original posters idea of a small standard size filter shell is obvious:

    1. Greater weight of, greter amount of, and greater volume of chemical.
    2. Lower gas velocity as the diameter of the pressure front is lowered by the greater diameter of the filter cartridge chemical.
    3. Longer dwell time as the length and diameter ratio of the standard 60 to 70 mm diameter cartridges is greater.
    4. Ability to filter air to a recognised breathing air standard even when the main compressor filter fails or is is totally spent for at least 12000 cu ft of process (with BPR) about 150 cylinder fills.

    IMHO this is the main reason why these products are called “Personnel Filter” it is frankly a bull**** statement They should be tested as filters under a recognised breathing air standard and not allowed to be sold to unsuspecting users. Or change the name to “Placebo Filter”. Just a thought LOL Iain Middlebrook
    Last edited by iain/hsm; June 23rd, 2009 at 07:20 AM. Reason: spelling

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •