The General Angst Over the PADI eLearning Program

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I have no problem with the establishment of a rigorous and comprehensive exam and dropping any standards as to how the information is to be gained.

I agree completely - performance based is great, provided it's a MEANINGFUL performance.

Except that e-learning is part and parcel of the same campaign that dumbed down the exams. As one of PADI's vice presidents said in a member forum years ago, "today's consumers want instant gratification, and we're going to give it to them!"
 
The problem I have with many (most?) scuba exams is that they tend to test your ability to interpret the question rather than your comprehension of the subject matter. This problem isn't unique to PADI ... every scuba exam I've ever seen seems to have a few questions on it that make you go "huh?" ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Grant me "a rigorous and comprehensive exam," not what exams look like in most courses, nothing more than a CYA form to point to later and say, see ...
 
CYA form to point to later and say, see ...
What's worse is that the DM exam is readily available in the Instructor's manual---isn't it? (for purchase)

I noticed in my DM examination some real slackers had the math before they got there. They had the problems in advance and could still barely do them. My clue was that they could not calculate tips---but they could do more advanced reasoning on the exam, where percentages were merely the first step.

AND that exam is essentially the Instructor's written exam portion, isn't it?
(more or less)

people are not receptive to hearing that....

What is it that REALLY concerns you about PADI eLearning?
That the exams are not changed up and that shop employees and insiders have them. (and PADI knows it, relies on it)

God, I sound like Walter.
 
....<snip>.......What's this to do with E-learning? E-learning was instituted as part of PADI's long standing campaign to trivialize personal responsibility, commitment, effort and effort in dive training, and trivialize the perceived risk in diving itself, in order to lure the dollars of the average immature and stupid consumer. I suspect most people who have concerns about E-learning are really more uncomfortable with the motivation then with the concept itself.

You know, it is pretty amazing what we STATE AS FACT because we have some reason for wanting to BELIEVE IT IS FACT. I expect you made the statement above without any corporate indication that it was correct. If that is so, one could argue that it is harmful to PADI, and that you don't have the right to make such a harmful statement absent some factual basis on which to state. Now, making that statement as an extension of your supposition as to why they might have launched e-Learning would be ok. You didn't do that. You stated flatly that PADI created e-Learning as a part of a LONG STANDING CAMPAIGN to trivialize personal responsibility, committment, effort, and effort in dive training. I think you are wrong.

I think (I take that back...i KNOW) PADI created e-Learning to be able to deliver academic training materials in a format that is the anticipated DESIRED format of the generation of customers they will serve in the future. Argument and debate as to their success in the endeavor is fully justified, but subscribing some negative motive to the doing is not fair. PADI has stated as much publically in several different presentations I have heard. They are trying to develop a better method to deliver the academic training materials that support dive training.

I operate a PADI training school. We train about 100 new open water divers each year. They are taught to the PADI standards. When they receive their certification cards, they can perform the skills outlined by PADI and the RSTC. Honestly, we don't add much to the PADI standards. We don't do anything to supplant OUR idea of how dive training should be done. We follow the standards, we properly evaluate the students, we provided them with demonstration quality skills and we insist that they have mastery of those skills. Trust me, it can be done correctly.

Now, for instructors who CHOOSE to skirt the skills, who have no experience in adult education, who don't have an organized presentation designed to make the students learn, who don't have a body of experience to present a concept in several ways so that ALL understand......well, I expect that teaching is difficult NO MATTER WHICH agency they use.

Success in developing divers who have fun, are safe, and are reasonably prepared for emergencies can be done. In many cases, it can be done BETTER with e-Learning. The continuation of the argument that PADI is the root of all evil in scuba completely misses the point that more stores, instructors, and CONSUMERS choose PADI than any other certification agency. After all of these years, if all of these people had been wrong, you would think that PADI would be seeing a SERIOUS reversal of fortunes.

Phil Ellis
Discount Scuba Gear at DiveSports.com - Buy Scuba Diving Equipment & Snorkeling Equipment
 
Great post, Phil. You are so right on.

One might also add that one of the initial reseaons for creating the elearning program was that several major universities highly encouraged it to continue PADI classes in their curriculum.
 
Great post, Phil. You are so right on.

One might also add that one of the initial reseaons for creating the elearning program was that several major universities highly encouraged it to continue PADI classes in their curriculum.
That's a highly deceptive, and dubious statement. I'd be interested to see documentation of any university "highly encouraging" PADI (or for that matter anyone else) to create e-learning programs (or for that matter any program).

The only university that I know that ever issued entry-level PADI certifications for anything except the standard, run of the mill, entry level course run as a PE activity program was Cal State Fullerton when Eric Hanauer was the DSO there.

When PADI came out with their rules that made it impossible for Universities to conduct their own Instructor Programs, as the institutions had been doing, they quit PADI in droves. I conducted instructor crossover programs for some of the people who where in charge of such programs, for example the Aquatic Director at the United States Military Academy (West Point).

Many more quit PADI when the rules about not being able to require higher standards went into effect. The general consensus amongst Academic Senates was that PADI had no business restricting what a university could require.

So that idea that, somehow, the weight of academia standards behind PADI runs counter to my experience which is that within the academic diving community PADI is generally seen as a rather negative influence.
 
That's a highly deceptive, and dubious statement. I'd be interested to see documentation of any university "highly encouraging" PADI (or for that matter anyone else) to create e-learning programs (or for that matter any program).

That is straight from the mouth of the Southeast Regional Manager (I hope that title is right) at our update last night (less than 24 hours ago).

As for the college credit....maybe "their curriculum" wasnt the right phrase. Maybe it is better to say "elecive credit." No where did I talk about IDCs or instructor training. We are discussing the PADI Open Water Diver class, correct? The entry level course?

College Credits - The American Council of Education

I dont think I was being "highly" dubious or deceptive, Thal. Maybe you can show me where? Once again thanks for the history lesson and name dropping. As usual I am in complete awe.
 
That's a highly deceptive, and dubious statement. I'd be interested to see documentation of any university "highly encouraging" PADI (or for that matter anyone else) to create e-learning programs (or for that matter any program).

I don't know if it was blather or just "piling on of justifications", but I was personally told by Drew Pearson that several "colleges" had worked with them to move this elearning program forward. Mostly, it was state-level 2 and 4 years colleges, using the open water class as a PE credit. They say that their students prefer elearning to classrooms.

Anyway, that is what I heard.

Phil Ellis
Discount Scuba Gear at DiveSports.com - Buy Scuba Diving Equipment & Snorkeling Equipment
 
That is straight from the mouth of the Southeast Regional Manager (I hope that title is right) at our update last night (less than 24 hours ago).

As for the college credit....maybe "their curriculum" wasnt the right phrase. Maybe it is better to say "elecive credit." No where did I talk about IDCs or instructor training.

I donut think I was being dubious or deceptive, Thal.
I do not think that you intended to be deceptive. But, you are repeating a claim without checking the reality. What do you really think Mike Kurczweski knows about what &#8220;major universities&#8221; have &#8220;highly encouraged?&#8221; Trust me, that&#8217;s my world, he doesn&#8217;t know squat.

Matt, I don&#8217;t mean to put you on the spot, but we all need to be careful when rising to moldy bait.

As far as the ACE is concerned, you need to understand what is actually going on. ACE is a very large organization, one small corner of which attempts to equate programs that are traditionally run outside of an academic setting with what goes on inside an academic setting. Typical programs include things like Microsoft Certification classes taught through the military, project management courses run by the CIA and examinations conducted by the Professional Aviation Maintenance Association. PADI lobbied hard to get it&#8217;s courses setup in that mode, something that many groups have done. But keep in mind that ACE only makes a &#8220;recommendation.&#8221; In point of fact, with respect to PADI, this is exactly what PADI really says:
The American Council of Education (ACE) recommends college credit for certain PADI scuba diver and Emergency First Response (EFR) courses. The ACE credit recommendations for PADI and EFR courses may help you in receiving college credit at an America university or college - even if the courses aren't conducted on a university or college campus.
Note the use of the word "may," more on that later. Let&#8217;s look at the PADI Open Water Diver for a moment. Here&#8217;s the write up from the ACE website:
Open Water Diver

ACE Transcript Data: PADI-0007

Organization: PADI International, Inc.

Location: Various locations throughout the United States and internationally, including PADI Affiliated Dive Centers and Resorts.

Length: 30 hours (flexible modular schedule).

Dates: January 1978 &#8211; Present

Description: 30 HRS (FLEXIBLE MODULAR SCHEDULE) STUDENT WILL ENGAGE IN BEGINNING RECREATIONAL SCUBA DIVING ACTIVITIES IN LOCAL AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS W/OUT DIRECT/INDIRECT SUPERVISION BY CERTIFIED DIVING INSTRUCTOR.

Objective: To provide students with the necessary entry-level knowledge and skills to scuba dive. Learning Outcome: Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to engage in beginning recreational scuba diving activities in local aquatic environments without direct or indirect supervision by a certified diving instructor. Instruction: Major topics covered in the course are adapting to the underwater world, underwater communications, dive planning; diving equipment; boat diving; health for diving; dive tables; marine life identification; the underwater environment; and skill development in a confined water (e.g. ocean, lake, spring, quarry). Methods of instruction include lectures with audio/visual materials, demonstrations, discussions, and evaluation through written unit quizzes and final examination.

Credit Recommendation: In the lower division baccalaureate/associate degree category, 1 semester hour in Physical Education or Recreation (3/87) (9/00) (9/04).
Does today&#8217;s PADI course even meet this description? Is it 30 hours long? Is the method of instruction, &#8220;lectures with audio/visual materials, demonstrations, discussions, and evaluation through written unit quizzes and final examination?&#8221; Help me out, that description seems to me to require 1/3 more course than is run today, was well as actual lectures.

Anyway, over the years I had maybe a dozen students, who where PADI certified divers, request credit for their PADI training. Here are two examples that I posted earlier:

I don't know what this has to do with pricing, most students who took our course took it on "overload," so the credits didn't actually cost them anything. The ACE thing is a complete crock. I had a student demand to get credit for my course because they had a PADI certification. I said no, and she hauled out the ACE and PADI documents. I still said no and she took all that crap to the Academic Senate. I agreed to let her take the written final and pool skill exam, she flunked both. That was the end of the story, but it cost me way more time than it was worth.

I remember getting something in the campus mail from the Dean of Arts and Sciences that a student wanted to get credit for my class because he had a PADI card, included was a letter from PADI that said that the American Council of Education recommends 1 PE credit for his Open Water certification and included a piece of paper that PADI ginned up to look like a college transcript. It was amazing. Anyway, I got this and sent a note back that I did not teach a PE course, but rather an engineering course, that my course was upper division not lower division and that my course was 4 credits not 1. But I offered to permit him to challenge the course: take a swim test, free diving test, scuba test and final written exam. Would it surprise you to hear that he could not swim 400 meters? And he had the nerve to complain that you didn't need to swim to be able to dive. How many of you can remember when a 440yd swim was a course entry requirement, per standards? Then it was moved to, "can complete by the end of the course," then reduced to 220, etc. reductum ad absurdum.

The third example was a real charm, the most extreme. A student, who was a PADI Instructor, wanted credit for PADI Open Water, PADI Advanced, and a couple of specialty courses. His request was based on the fact that all the course included material that we included in our class and they all added up to a bit more than 100 hours. He also wanted credit for PADI Assistant Instructor and PADI Instructor based on the AI and Instructor courses that we ran. If you want to read the details of the PADI courses on the ACE website, here a link.

He was looking for something like seven credits. I gave him the now standard deal, he did pass the swim test, but did very poorly on the final exam. He was not able to complete the confined water tests. He had the balls to complain to my Administration that that his prior training had not prepared him for either the written or pool exam, that he could not imagine anyone but a SEAL (his words not mine) could pass either, and so (ipso facto) I had to have been rougher on him than I was on "normal" students who took the course(s).

I was fortunate that the President&#8217;s wife had taken the 100 hr course a year before (she was a hot ticket, not the sort of thing I&#8217;d recommend for most people in their last 60s). She made it quite clear that I had asked this student to do anything that she had not been asked to do.

But he wouldn&#8217;t go away, he still wanted to know about the AI and Instructor credits. I told him that that was out of the question since the written exam that he flunked was the NAUI Master Diver Exam (conceptually the NAUI Instructor Exam without the teaching and NAUI sections). Even that did not end it, but he finally sort of just petered out and went away.
I don't know if it was blather or just "piling on of justifications", but I was personally told by Drew Pearson that several "colleges" had worked with them to move this elearning program forward. Mostly, it was state-level 2 and 4 years colleges, using the open water class as a PE credit. They say that their students prefer elearning to classrooms.

Anyway, that is what I heard.

Phil Ellis
Discount Scuba Gear at DiveSports.com - Buy Scuba Diving Equipment & Snorkeling Equipment
Sounds like something Drew would say. He is one of the nicest people I know and one of PADI's best salesman, he has even convinced me of things when I knew better. Drew has good contacts at those levels and a great rapport with the "PE world." But you must admit that it is a major jump to go from there to what was stated. I'm confident saying that most all of the "non-PE activity class" people involved with academic diving programs do not happen to agree with him, they feel that just as the business department must rise above the local business trades school, that university level diver training should rise above that offered at the local dive shop.

Keep in mind that PADI undertook this initiative (obtaining ACE recommendations) in order to open up college pools and facilities to individuals who would otherwise never be approved as college instructors or adjunct faculty, it was not done in a vacuum, or as a service to PADI divers.
 
Thal, I reported what I was told. It squares with what the original poster said (I think). It is perfectly understandable that Drew would be PADI's "best salesman". After all, he is the President of that for-profit corporation and failing to be the best salesman would, even in your opinion, make him a little less prepared for his job (which is leading PADI).

This argument will never be settled. Data can roll from both sides. But, to get back to the point of this original thread......the PADI eLearning program HAS NOTHING to do with the dumbing down of scuba education. It is, by inception and by design, another way to deliver academic study materials to support a PADI Open Water Diver scuba class. Thinking that the class is a bad one doesn't change what it is....another way to deliver academic materials.

Phil Ellis
Discount Scuba Gear at DiveSports.com - Buy Scuba Diving Equipment & Snorkeling Equipment
 

Back
Top Bottom