Microevolution is evolution within a species as stated by wickedpedia. I have never refuted that and basically stated that in the beginning. As far as mutations/adaptations I was speaking specifically of those of a larger scale. The kind that would require a wombat's pouch to invert. You don't see them in nature because animals born with a visible mutation, generally become prey, or die of starvation. The kind of evolution you believe in, macro evolution, has no evidence of transitional forms in the fossil record. It requires a tremendous amount of faith to extrapolate between the fossils.
So in the spirit of your post before about small changes over millions of years, how would that split occur? So you have a pouched ancestor that suddenly spawned two species with inverted pouches?
Thas has trouble with spelling and you obviously have issues with reading comprehension. I never said it didn't count, I stated that it was the primary reason for slavery inside of Judea in Christs day. But, I did show you how to read the verse in context and you either didn't get it, or chose to ignore it.
The world cannot be moved, shaken, ie is firmly established. Taken in context in the first part of the verse it has more to do with metaphorical strength and position. Sort of like if I said you were as immovable as a mule. It doesn't mean that either you or the mule don't move, simply a met-a-phor.
BTW, I acknowledged that the early church got it wrong much to the chagrin of Galileo. But just like when you update science in light of additional knowledge, the interpretation of a passage can change as well.
1 The words of the Teacher, [a] son of David, king in Jerusalem:
2 "Meaningless! Meaningless!"
says the Teacher.
"Utterly meaningless!
Everything is meaningless."
3 What does man gain from all his labor
at which he toils under the sun?
4 Generations come and generations go,
but the earth remains forever.
5 The sun rises and the sun sets,
and hurries back to where it rises.
6 The wind blows to the south
and turns to the north;
round and round it goes,
ever returning on its course.
7 All streams flow into the sea,
yet the sea is never full.
To the place the streams come from,
there they return again.
8 All things are wearisome,
more than one can say.
The eye never has enough of seeing,
nor the ear its fill of hearing.
9 What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.
Solomon was ranting on how meaningless life is. Again, he uses the colloquial usage of the sun. When he says "under" the sun its very clear he doesn't mean a literal position.
So the homeless work in the streets, your point is?
first I've never been a very compassionate christian. It is one of my weaknesses. But again, you compare the horrible acts of slavery with the form of slavery in Jesus's day and the two just don't mix. The Romans pretty much let the Jews run the house in those days. While the Jews had slaves they were more akin to indentured servants. As a matter of fact, many slaves in that day lived better lives than those of free men. But you would've acted out of character if you had not tried to spin that. You still lost the battle in the end because it very clear to any reader than Jesus was not endorsing slavery.
You instead choose to focus on the spelling of another poster. 
