Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It looks like Sona. That is why transmistter needs to be in water as well. But what is a diver is above water already but wash away by current, this system won't work. Range of this method from the boat is OK because boat has unlimited power, and even that the claim is 100ft. If the transmistter was pocket size, I am not so sure about the range anymore. But still a nice underwater beacan device.
I guess you need both, sona for underwater, then Nautilus for above water. I can buy the concept.
How often do you ascend into a squall? (More accurately, descend when a storm warning is in effect.)Actually, a more practical and immediate application would be to find lost [living] divers on the surface. If you've ever ascended into a squall, and the boat is a kilometer away picking up some other divers -- or gawd ferbid, over the horizon somewhere -- this might come in handy.
Mandatory just rubs me the wrong way. Why do YOU (the general you) care what happens to MY dead body?
I don't think that you are going to get any experienced diver supporting anything "mandatory" in diving, but we might want to think about how people outside of diving might see this.
I lost two good friends over the past month (Lynne and Tom). Neither of them were ever found, but both of their accidents triggered a massive air and sea search by the Coast Guard, over several days. That was paid for by the taxpayers, and wasn't cheap. To me, that's fine, that's one of the reasons that we pay taxes, but we shouldn't pretend that everyone shares our priorities.
So maybe not for a swim over a Caribbean reef in 30 feet of water, but I can certainly see someone in authority who is not a diver pushing for a transponder like that on bigger dives.
The issue, of course, will be the fact that outside of a place like Dutch Springs (small, confined, not deep, no current, requiring a specific dive plan) the practical utility of such a transponder is limited at best.
I don't think that you are going to get any experienced diver supporting anything "mandatory" in diving, but we might want to think about how people outside of diving might see this.
I lost two good friends over the past month (Lynne and Tom). Neither of them were ever found, but both of their accidents triggered a massive air and sea search by the Coast Guard, over several days. That was paid for by the taxpayers, and wasn't cheap. To me, that's fine, that's one of the reasons that we pay taxes, but we shouldn't pretend that everyone shares our priorities.
So maybe not for a swim over a Caribbean reef in 30 feet of water, but I can certainly see someone in authority who is not a diver pushing for a transponder like that on bigger dives.
I am sorry for the loss of you friends, having two lost in the same month without closure is horrible.
You've made a good point about the cost of a Coast Guard search, I hadn't thought of that. Keep in mind though that having a VHF radio isn't required on many boats (at least in Florida). One would hope that putting trackers on divers would come WAY after requiring boaters to carry a radio.