SAC vs RMV, revisited

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

As in surface liters, yes. PV = nRT.
Is that a standard unit or just made up ?

Does it have an abbreviation?

Why can’t we use surface cu.ft. ?
 
I don't measure my gas consumption in volume per time. I measure my gas consumption in surface volume per time.

As do I, nothing worse than finding out I didn't, makes the ascent too exciting for me.
 
European mpg convention in metric is a little weird. They use km/100L.
No, we usually use L/100km. Basically the inverse of your mpg. Units notwithstanding.
 
Why can’t we use surface cu.ft. ?
Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.
 
Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.
I think you must have mistaken me with someone else though, because I am French so if I used anything else than litres for volume it was just to continue someone’s else discussion. :p

I understand the point of using quantity of gas vs volume though I was confused by the earlier post.
 
I think you must have mistaken me with someone else
most of y'all. This board is rather heavily US-centric.
 
Can't you? I'd love if you did, but most of y'all seem to me to insist on using cu.ft/min, pressure be damned.
Actually, most do not do what you say. They start with psi/min at depth, convert that to surface cuft/min. They just don't call it surface cuft.
 
They just don't call it surface cuft
Which makes for a non-zero amount of confusion. Cite? See upthread.
 
No, we usually use L/100km. Basically the inverse of your mpg. Units notwithstanding.

My bad. I got the units mixed up. Like I said it’s weird way of measuring how much distance you gain per volume of gas.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom