The author (anonymous, of course) gives 2 stars for diving and for food, 4 or 5 stars for everything else.
He lauds the diving, mostly, but did not like his own SMB skills; it is unclear otherwise why just 2 stars, except he mentions several times there are no big creatures.... Kind of unfair, I think. You could just as well criticize (and give 2 stars) to Galapagos diving because there are no tiny nudibranchs or frogfish. It is like going to a basketball game and complaining that they were playing terrible football.
He doesn't like the food..."No American-style burgers or pizza." Seriously? You go to a resort in the Philippines and complain there are no burgers or pizza? If you don't like Filipino food and the way the chicken is cut up, don't go to the Philippines. Sheesh.
He lauds the diving, mostly, but did not like his own SMB skills; it is unclear otherwise why just 2 stars, except he mentions several times there are no big creatures.... Kind of unfair, I think. You could just as well criticize (and give 2 stars) to Galapagos diving because there are no tiny nudibranchs or frogfish. It is like going to a basketball game and complaining that they were playing terrible football.
He doesn't like the food..."No American-style burgers or pizza." Seriously? You go to a resort in the Philippines and complain there are no burgers or pizza? If you don't like Filipino food and the way the chicken is cut up, don't go to the Philippines. Sheesh.