@The Chairman your shell separation could be a couple things. Could be anything from extruder temperature to number of shells, to print speed, to z-axis calibration, etc. What printer? What filament are you using?
There are quite a few different types of flexible filament (TPU, PolyFlex, FiberFlex, etc.). Some require a specialized extruder, some can be printed with a normal extruder. They come in different levels of flexibility. Printing a wound packing trainer is easy, but a 4x4x4 100% infill cube is gonna take like, 3 days..... 100% infill takes a ridiculous amount of time for most things. Changing the amount of infill is going to change what it feels and acts like. Running a 3D printer for that amount of time is a long time for things to go wrong. It's fine if you catch it right away, but when you're 3 hours from completed print and you end up with a wad of spaghetti you've wasted both a TON of filament and a bunch of time. If time = money, you're screwing yourself twice in the event of a failure.
That being said, a dual extruder printer could be a cool tool. You could simulate different tissue mass by using two different types of flexible filament, or using some sort of flexible filament for tissue and PLA or ABS for bone could be interesting. In a large enough print you could really demonstrate effective application of a CAT. You could even demonstrate the differences in stopping blood loss with different types of tourniquet. As in, how a CAT differs from a SOFTT from a RATS, etc.
Your best bet is going to be to make your own by using some sort of mold. Pour it in, let it cure, and drive on. Silicone or something similar maybe? Check out dentist mold making stuff. I wouldn't use ballistic gelatin. It's not stable across the temperature range. It's really only good for simulating wound patterns in soft tissue, and even then, a roid monkey and Fat Albert are going to be different densities, which side will you lean towards when you're making them?
Non-scuba question. I teach stop the bleed courses and wound packing trainers cost 150-300 each, how hard would it be to 3d print a 4x 4 x 4 block (preferably with a somewhat soft material ) with a simulated gunshot wound and a cavity below it?
There are quite a few different types of flexible filament (TPU, PolyFlex, FiberFlex, etc.). Some require a specialized extruder, some can be printed with a normal extruder. They come in different levels of flexibility. Printing a wound packing trainer is easy, but a 4x4x4 100% infill cube is gonna take like, 3 days..... 100% infill takes a ridiculous amount of time for most things. Changing the amount of infill is going to change what it feels and acts like. Running a 3D printer for that amount of time is a long time for things to go wrong. It's fine if you catch it right away, but when you're 3 hours from completed print and you end up with a wad of spaghetti you've wasted both a TON of filament and a bunch of time. If time = money, you're screwing yourself twice in the event of a failure.
That being said, a dual extruder printer could be a cool tool. You could simulate different tissue mass by using two different types of flexible filament, or using some sort of flexible filament for tissue and PLA or ABS for bone could be interesting. In a large enough print you could really demonstrate effective application of a CAT. You could even demonstrate the differences in stopping blood loss with different types of tourniquet. As in, how a CAT differs from a SOFTT from a RATS, etc.
Your best bet is going to be to make your own by using some sort of mold. Pour it in, let it cure, and drive on. Silicone or something similar maybe? Check out dentist mold making stuff. I wouldn't use ballistic gelatin. It's not stable across the temperature range. It's really only good for simulating wound patterns in soft tissue, and even then, a roid monkey and Fat Albert are going to be different densities, which side will you lean towards when you're making them?