I want to add a shutoff valve to my second stage regulators.
I had this idea yesterday, and I just finished drawing a few diagrams to see if it seemed feasible.
Why a shutoff valve:
When a regulator starts to freeflow at 30ft with a buddy nearby, it is safe to breath off it and do a safety stop, but what if you are at 130ft and you are breathing a special gas? That special gas may be absolutely necessary to your survival. Shutting off the bad reg and breathing from the octo could easily save your life.
Or what if you are simply at 100ft with plenty of air and the spare starts to freeflow?
You may not have enough air to complete a safety stop, by the time you get up to 15 ft.
The point is: A freeflowing regulator is a dangerous waste of air, and it can be stopped quickly and safely, allowing a diver to use the octo to safely end the dive.
Where, and what kind of valve:
I envision a twist-top on/off valve on the stage 2 hose, between the lp hose and the LP seat.
However, while writing this I realized that one might use a valve that lets you limit the air flow without stopping it, possibly allowing a freeflow to be turned down to a safe, breathable trickle, in the event you do not have an octo for some reason (I dont know if technical divers have octos on every tank, and this seems especially good for them.)
Possible problems:
1.Leaving the octo off could kill a dive buddy
2.If the first stage is causing the freeflow, shutting off both valves could cause explosion.
3.Accidental closure might scare the living daylights out of you.
4.It is an added point of failure.
My opinions/solutions
1. In the event a diver needs your air, give him the working one and THEN turn on the octo. Obviously you should never start the dive with a freeflowing reg turned off. It is an emergency solution only.
2.This should be explained to any diver attempting to use shutoffs. This also seems like a reason in support of shutoffs:If both regs are freeflowing, shutting off one may save enough air to protect the diver.
3.Why would you ever start a dive without checking the regs? and if you closed the valve during a dive, perform normal emergency procedures: Grab an octo and THEN sort out the problem. No real problem here.
4. An added valve IS a point of failiure. There is no way around it, however I think that the chance to save vital air outweighs the added trouble spot.
Opinions? Problems I didnt spot? Solutions that dont add up?
I had this idea yesterday, and I just finished drawing a few diagrams to see if it seemed feasible.
Why a shutoff valve:
When a regulator starts to freeflow at 30ft with a buddy nearby, it is safe to breath off it and do a safety stop, but what if you are at 130ft and you are breathing a special gas? That special gas may be absolutely necessary to your survival. Shutting off the bad reg and breathing from the octo could easily save your life.
Or what if you are simply at 100ft with plenty of air and the spare starts to freeflow?
You may not have enough air to complete a safety stop, by the time you get up to 15 ft.
The point is: A freeflowing regulator is a dangerous waste of air, and it can be stopped quickly and safely, allowing a diver to use the octo to safely end the dive.
Where, and what kind of valve:
I envision a twist-top on/off valve on the stage 2 hose, between the lp hose and the LP seat.
However, while writing this I realized that one might use a valve that lets you limit the air flow without stopping it, possibly allowing a freeflow to be turned down to a safe, breathable trickle, in the event you do not have an octo for some reason (I dont know if technical divers have octos on every tank, and this seems especially good for them.)
Possible problems:
1.Leaving the octo off could kill a dive buddy
2.If the first stage is causing the freeflow, shutting off both valves could cause explosion.
3.Accidental closure might scare the living daylights out of you.
4.It is an added point of failure.
My opinions/solutions
1. In the event a diver needs your air, give him the working one and THEN turn on the octo. Obviously you should never start the dive with a freeflowing reg turned off. It is an emergency solution only.
2.This should be explained to any diver attempting to use shutoffs. This also seems like a reason in support of shutoffs:If both regs are freeflowing, shutting off one may save enough air to protect the diver.
3.Why would you ever start a dive without checking the regs? and if you closed the valve during a dive, perform normal emergency procedures: Grab an octo and THEN sort out the problem. No real problem here.
4. An added valve IS a point of failiure. There is no way around it, however I think that the chance to save vital air outweighs the added trouble spot.
Opinions? Problems I didnt spot? Solutions that dont add up?