DevilDoc, I appreciate the clarification.It was the second dive of the day with the same tank. Nothing (to my knowledge at least) was removed during the SI.
Yes he does run it through about halfway down the back to the inflator position. The thing I was talking about is take away that port location and make that hose part of the BC itself. Then you can add a small connection somewhere on the back or rear of the shoulder.
Yes he does have a redundant air source (safe second) on his i3 (which in my opinion also completely negates the whole streamlined concept of BOTH devices). I did not actually experience it, just witnessed him kneeling on the ground then saying he was going up. HIS description made it sound almost like a combination of problems.
It seemed as though one of the OPV's might have been loose as well, otherwise I can personally not think of a reason why the BC would LOSE air at a depth of 25 whole feet. perhaps it was a combination of the two?
I reference to NetDocs comment about operator error, I would not argue with that, however when someone is using a "traditional inflator" or even a safe second the can actually LOOK down and see the problem and fix it. However (at least my buddy) could not see it on his own due to its placement location.
I still am not convinced that this is the way to go, at least personally. I started out originally by stating that I could forsee potential problems and I still stand by that assessment at this poitn in time.
I see now what you mean about extending the inflator connection, to essentially move it away from the lever, and frankly that would be a good idea. However, it would have to be still within easy reach to disconnect in the event of a free-flow or some other such issue. I haven't had any issues with its location so far, and as someone else pointed out, being located on the rigid i3 device, it allows 1-handed detachment and attachment, which is almost impossible on a traditional inflator.
I also understand wanting to keep the SS1 (I dove one for years, and loved it -- only moved to traditional octos out of necessity for other reasons. However, you're right, it does somewhat compromise the streamlining that you accomplish with the i3 lever.
The OPV valves are also a bit different, in that they don't just vent in synch, but, they are also check valves. So Dimension divers will notice (as I did) that you have little, if any, water in your wing at the end of your dive. I suppose one could have been loose, however, if he was actually losing air, I'd have it checked.
Oh... and if AquaLung is listening, I have one more item on my wish list for the Dimension:
- I was getting a fill at my LDS about an hour ago, and one of the DM's was showing me the Balance he dives... and the trim weight pockets you have built in between the backplate and the wing, up high so you don't need a tank trim weight. AWESOME idea!!!! Why didn't you incorporate that into the Dimension? Just sayin'....