My OW Instructor told me to dump all air in our BC's before ascending. He told the entire class multiple times. If I remember, he said it makes for a slower more controlled ascent.
I'm not sure if it was just his opinion or in the manual. If I cared, I would review the NAUI manual and see if it's in there. I don't.
I don't want to stray too far off topic but it's wrong. You start an ascent neutral and release air as you ascend, not dump all air then start an ascent. If you're wearing a thick exposure suit, or drysuit, which requires a lot of weight, then ditching all your air at depth means you will be excessively negatively buoyant, and you effectively have to swim to the surface using fin power only, carrying that weight with you. If something were to go wrong, you would sink.
I don't have a copy of the new OW manual to hand but here is a good example from the PADI AOW Peak Performance Buoyancy Dive Knowledge Review, question 4:
4. Place a check next to those instances in which you need to adjust your buoyancy during a dive
- to compensate for buoyancy changes as you use your air
- to compensate for buoyancy changes due to expose suit protection
- to begin an ascent
- to compensate for increased buoyancy during ascent.
The correct answer is a, b, d NOT c.... that's the first reference that pops to mind. I don't know about other agency stuff but I would assume it's similar.
Back to the topic - It's possible that this is what was slowing the OP's ascent - and boulderjohn is right, you don't have to keep the ascent rate monitor at the smallest level possible, just not exceed it. Still no excuse for dragging divers around though.
Whilst I'm here - yes, according to decompression theory you are still technically on-gassing as you ascend. Parts of the "theoretical body tissues" absorb nitrogen quickly, others more slowly - and it is this rate of absorption which is important. For the "slower" tissues, the rate of absorption might decrease, but on-gassing still occurs. Think of it like a balance - a long pivot like a see-saw which has - random numbers - 50 kilos at each end. Add 10 kilos to the right hand side and the that side will descend. If you put a ball on the left end, it will roll downhill to the right. As it's rolling, add 11 kilos to the left - the left hand side now weighs one kilo more than the right and although the right hand side will now start to ascend, the ball will keep rolling to the right hand side until the balance point is reached and it changes direction. That's an imperfect analogy but a good one - the right hand side of the balance (the diver) is ascending, but the ball is still rolling towards it (on-gassing).... until it ascends far enough for the pressure imbalance to change direction. If you see what I mean.
Cheers n beers
C.