- Messages
- 16,421
- Reaction score
- 5,227
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Watch, depth gauge: Good for really shallow square profile dives.
Computer: Use with watch & depth gauge--compare them.
Tables: Good for square profiles. Many dives are.
eRDPml: Good for "true" multi-level dives (If you go to 60' and gradually ascens to shore, or up on a wreck without leveling off at specific depths, it is pretty useless). Use computer and be conservative.
Computer vs. Tables/analog, etc.: All theoretcal data, of course: computers tell you exactly what your remaining bottom time is. Tables on pretty much square profiles are more comservative because your depth gauge
needle may read 60'. But unless your head is in the sand the whole time you may have averaged 57 feet. If I am doing a multi level dive I use the computer, but try to reach my safety stop with a bit more remaining bottom time than had I used tables.
Personally I have not felt the need to have any more than one computer and one watch.
Computer: Use with watch & depth gauge--compare them.
Tables: Good for square profiles. Many dives are.
eRDPml: Good for "true" multi-level dives (If you go to 60' and gradually ascens to shore, or up on a wreck without leveling off at specific depths, it is pretty useless). Use computer and be conservative.
Computer vs. Tables/analog, etc.: All theoretcal data, of course: computers tell you exactly what your remaining bottom time is. Tables on pretty much square profiles are more comservative because your depth gauge
needle may read 60'. But unless your head is in the sand the whole time you may have averaged 57 feet. If I am doing a multi level dive I use the computer, but try to reach my safety stop with a bit more remaining bottom time than had I used tables.
Personally I have not felt the need to have any more than one computer and one watch.
Last edited: