I'm not sure how lawyers and the US Constitution got dragged into all this, but some of the comments seemed odd. Of course the Constitution does not address the issue of proper behavior for lawyers, just as it does not address the proper behavior of architects. The Constitution does guarantee a significant list of personal and political protections in the Bill of Rights, and in several Amendments subsequent to those first ten.
Lawyers simply speak for individuals. That's what advocate means. They represent and present the position of an individual within the legal system. It seems to me that it is prosecutors who do most of the suppressing and distorting of evidence. It's usually a pretty unequal contest for the average defendant, considering the vast resources of police and prosecutors. As some prosecutors have pointed out, it's easy to convict a guilty defendant. A really skilled prosecutor is able to convict innocent defendants as well. And they do. It's all about winning.
Lawyers simply speak for individuals. That's what advocate means. They represent and present the position of an individual within the legal system. It seems to me that it is prosecutors who do most of the suppressing and distorting of evidence. It's usually a pretty unequal contest for the average defendant, considering the vast resources of police and prosecutors. As some prosecutors have pointed out, it's easy to convict a guilty defendant. A really skilled prosecutor is able to convict innocent defendants as well. And they do. It's all about winning.