CT
the intent of my comment was that it (for me) provides a continuing learning opportunity. To watch the computer and try to out guess it , so to speek, to the point that you can start predicting what the computer will provide in the near future. ie 80 ft and you go to 50 ft. How will the computer respond to this movement. You start working a little harder and you can see when your time remaining becomes controlled by gas supply and not the ndl, ect. This has been a great learning tool for me. Not just that,,,, i start comparing various agincies tables to computer results and i begin to understand them better. preticularly when it comes to the definition of bottom time or how the assumptions for using the tables affect the difference n the tables. I doesnt take a lifetime to be able to tell when the computer may be lying. When you understand the factors involved,, buddy checks become more meaningful. it even makes dive planning easier..Like DO THE DEEP STUFF FIRST AND THE SHALLOWER STUFF LAST. What doesnt make sence , you start asking why and it leads to continued learning. You can definately seee the difference in the o2bg and n2bg when doing nitrox. AS opposed to a learning device perhaps its more a validation tool as well as a tool for identifying lacks in knowledge.
Refiewing the dive log and profile is the best thing short of a video replay of the dive for pointing out assect rates ect.
the intent of my comment was that it (for me) provides a continuing learning opportunity. To watch the computer and try to out guess it , so to speek, to the point that you can start predicting what the computer will provide in the near future. ie 80 ft and you go to 50 ft. How will the computer respond to this movement. You start working a little harder and you can see when your time remaining becomes controlled by gas supply and not the ndl, ect. This has been a great learning tool for me. Not just that,,,, i start comparing various agincies tables to computer results and i begin to understand them better. preticularly when it comes to the definition of bottom time or how the assumptions for using the tables affect the difference n the tables. I doesnt take a lifetime to be able to tell when the computer may be lying. When you understand the factors involved,, buddy checks become more meaningful. it even makes dive planning easier..Like DO THE DEEP STUFF FIRST AND THE SHALLOWER STUFF LAST. What doesnt make sence , you start asking why and it leads to continued learning. You can definately seee the difference in the o2bg and n2bg when doing nitrox. AS opposed to a learning device perhaps its more a validation tool as well as a tool for identifying lacks in knowledge.
Refiewing the dive log and profile is the best thing short of a video replay of the dive for pointing out assect rates ect.
I hope this isn't how divers are learning about deep to shallow