Diver Indicted in 2003 GBR mishap

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Status
Not open for further replies.
fyi an update from the inquest today:


Husband killed honeymooner: police - National - smh.com.au

Husband killed honeymooner: police

The husband of a young newlywed who died diving on the Great Barrier Reef should be charged with her murder, a coronial inquest was told today.

The inquest into the death of American woman Christina Mae Watson, known as Tina, is hearing final submissions today in Townsville, and the coroner, David Glasgow, is expected to make his findings public tomorrow.

The novice diver was 26 when she died at a shipwreck 89 kilometres south-east of Townsville in October 2003.

This morning, counsel assisting the inquest, John Tate, said investigating police submitted that Daniel Gabriel Watson should be charged with the murder of his wife of 11 days.

"There's a strong case to answer," he told the court. "There are too many unanswered questions. It's for a jury to determine the answers to those questions."

Mr Watson would have to be extradited from the United States to Australia to face any charges.

Mr Watson's barrister, Steve Zillman, is arguing against such a finding, saying that in some quarters, especially in the media, his client had been portrayed as guilty, leading to the "uneasy feeling" police had determined his guilt and conducted the investigation on that assumption.

Evidence presented to the inquest suggested no obvious medical reason for her death, while her diving gear appeared to be working properly, leaving an accident or foul play the probable causes.

She was on her honeymoon with her new husband, an experienced diver known as Gabe, who chose not to appear at the inquest hearings.

They entered the water at 10.37am on October 22, diving to about 12 metres, before the dive leader saw her body on the sea floor at 10.42am. A minute later, Mr Watson surfaced, raising the alarm. The dive leader brought her to the surface at 10.44am, but she was declared dead 40 minutes later, after two doctors on the dive were unable to revive her.

Mr Glasgow suggested during hearings earlier this year he may make an adverse finding against Mr Watson.

Mr Watson is a trained rescue diver, but let his wife sink to the sea floor, saying she had panicked.

He recently discontinued legal proceedings against a travel insurer. In January, the court saw undercover video footage of him using bolt-cutters to remove flowers secured to his wife's grave in Alabama.

Two experienced divers who were with the couple on the dive accused Mr Watson of lying about his version of events - which has changed a number of times - saying it was never acceptable to leave a diving partner unless "they're dead".
 
This case is going to keep us opining for years. As sad as it is for the poor young woman and her family, the media is going to love this case.
 
anyone know if this guy is diving still? it appears he used to dive every weekend and is local to the Pelham Quarry in Birmingham, AL area. (Pelham quarry aka Alabama BlueWater Adventures)
 
anyone know if this guy is diving still? it appears he used to dive every weekend and is local to the Pelham Quarry in Birmingham, AL area. (Pelham quarry aka Alabama BlueWater Adventures)

If he is, he is probably having a heck of a time finding a buddy.
 
If he's a rescue diver, why didn't he go get her? *** HE LET HER SINK!

Gabe Watson: And I thought, “Well if I go to the bottom and she's unconscious or something I don't, other than dumping her equipment, I don't know of anything else to do.” RESCUE DIVER?

Doug Milsap: Ten feet is a pittance underwater. It's two fin kicks and you're on top of her. There's absolutely no reason why he couldn't have followed her down. I SEE...

as in most of those "lost at sea" or "vacationing divers dead" stories, somethings not right. Plus, if she was a newly certified diver, she was OW. So why were they planning to go to a shipwreck at 100 feet? It makes no sense.

I think he did something when they surfaced after the first dive
:shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead: :shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead::shakehead:
 
Last edited:
:wink:[QUOTE
Husband killed honeymooner: police

The husband of a young newlywed who died diving on the Great Barrier Reef should be charged with her murder, a coronial inquest was told today.


Don't think that turn of events suprised any one here on SB. Hell he's already been tried and convicted right here....by a jury of his peers no less. (peers in diving only). LOL. Again "may she rest in pease". Dam saddening really.:(
 
5 years and still ongoing. What could they have gained for info they couldn't have gotten 5 years ago. An inquest 5 years later.....It's a damn shame it took this long for a finding of any. I am sick thinking about the time value here and yet this family of hers just has to sit and wait. I can't imagine what they are going through. One easy way to solve it fast, ask him to take a lie detector test. Any innocent person would have no reason not to!
 
Lie detector tests aren't failsafe. A good lawyer would make sure it was never heard in court.

Anyway, it's going to take even longer for this to go to trial. What do you wanna bet the US won't be so keen on extradition?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom