CT-Rich
Contributor
Sherwood made a regulator in the 1980s called the Magnum Blizzard that had a heat sink built into the 2nd stage. I thought about buying it and then opted for the less expensive magnum.Wow, I have a Sherwood all the way back from 1986! The reg is almost 10 years older than me. That thing hasn't ever had a problem though. I love diving with that guy who gives me that goofy look on the boat for diving a ancient reg, but his brand new expensive one free flows the whole dive while I Flintstone it up! -2C?? wow I bet testicles are not existent at that temp no matter what you wear.
I have no idea about how effective it was in cold water. dive magazines at the time gave everyone a good review (I think they deducted points if one of the reviewers died during testing, but, it was kept to a minimum). I am not surprised to hear the older regs holding up better than modern gear. The technology hasn't changed much in the last 30-40 years. Most of the features added to create the premium regulator are premised on improving the profit margin more so than performance. A stripped down basic regulator is less likely to have as many possible failure points as a system with lots of bells and whistles. This is all supposition, of course, but metal transfers heat much more efficiently than nylon components therefore nylon would be less likely to ice up during a dive. A reg with more metal will have a higher profit margin. I could very well see lower end regs actually out performing the top of the line regs in cold water. But again, I am not a reg expert. I wonder if anyone with more experience with regs might have a comment?
My daughter is getting certified this year and she is going to start out with my Sherwood Magnum from the 1980s.