Independent Doubles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

If I were to dive ID's, it would be for the challenge of mastering them if nothing else.

I usually dive manifolded double HP 100's, but I have an old Benjamin rigged (non-isolator manifold) set of double 60's and a pair of ID steel 72's that I find useful for shore dives. I've never understood discussion of additional task loading for diving independent doubles (which is more or less implied by your mention of the "challenge of mastering them" and is frequently mentioned in other threads on independent doubles). In my book, anyone who is not comfortable doing a few reg switches probably shouldn't be diving manifolded doubles OR independent doubles.
 
I usually dive manifolded double HP 100's, but I have an old Benjamin rigged (non-isolator manifold) set of double 60's and a pair of ID steel 72's that I find useful for shore dives. I've never understood discussion of additional task loading for diving independent doubles (which is more or less implied by your mention of the "challenge of mastering them" and is frequently mentioned in other threads on independent doubles). In my book, anyone who is not comfortable doing a few reg switches probably shouldn't be diving manifolded doubles OR independent doubles.

I had the same take you did. Master what? ID's require less learning curve and attention than manifolds IMO. Quicker too, take reg out put second reg in .5 seconds. Exhale continue dive.
I dont' use a octo my other reg is my octo. Pony tank? Nah I got another just like the one I'm using, with the same kind of reg not some cheap "pony reg".
 
I am curious why you modified a poodle jacket, instead of just slapping them on a plate of your choice, al,ss,kydex?
Eric
 
I am curious why you modified a poodle jacket, instead of just slapping them on a plate of your choice, al,ss,kydex?
Eric

$$$$$$ don't have any.:( So I work with what I have.
 
Carrying tanks anywhere but on my back appears to me cumbersome and akward.Sidemounted tanks on some of the shore diving I do doesn't seem like a good idea to me. I don't mean to condem something I've never tried, I'm just giving my impressions. I may very well try some kind of slung gas bottles someday just to prove myself wrong. Right now my ID's are looking good and fit my type of diving very well.
It depends on the sidemount system used. The Nomad is intended to be flexible with an eye toward expedition diving where the conditions and demands may vary widely. I have found that with the new ring bungees, a Nomad will carry double tanks very comfortably during a surface walk and they have a much lower center of gravity that helps increase your stability over rough ground, climbing in and out of sinks, on rocks etc. And, as always, you have the option of making two trips with one tank each trip.

Where SM still does not impress me is in off shore boat diving where you may have to board on a ladder in fairly heavy seas. The SM tanks are less solidly mounted and the potentil weight shifts can be de-stabilizing. Worst case though you could remove the tanks, clip them to a gear line and come aboard with no tanks - but that adds work for the crew.

That's almost what I did. Rules of thumb are good but gas management is really governed by the dive and conditions.
I dove independent doubles with travel bands for years - back before sidemounting made independent doubles cool again. I did so because it fit the diving I did very well - any wreck dives of note required travel and renting tanks was the norm with rentable doubles being very rarly encountered - but I none the less took lots of heat for it from the manifold crowd and task loading was frequently cited.

But, as you know, the additional task loading is only two switches per dive.

-----

However, be very careful about winging the gas management if you get into soft or hard overhead environments. Independent doubles only add an extra level of safety if you always ensure you have the gas left in either tank that is at least equal to the total you used to get to the point you turn the dive (and that still does not takee into account deco requirements, so your "thirds" may need to be a little smaller than actual thirds).

For example, if I have steel 72's slightly overfilled to 2400 psi, I have 69 cu ft per tank split into 800 psi "thirds" of 23 cu ft each. That gives 46 cu ft for penetration, 46 cu ft to return and 46 cu ft in reserve at the end of the dive, split with 23 cu ft in each tank.

Similarly, it leaves 46 cu ft in each tank when I reach the max pentration/turn point, assuming I use the 1/3rd-2/3rds-1/3rd gas switch approach. In that case I will have 46 cu ft left in either tank to make my exit, but it leaves no margin for any delay or deco obligation.

If I reduce the "thirds" to 700 psi , I will reduce the pentration gas to 40 cu ft, but I will increase the end of dive reserve to 58 cu ft, and at the turn point, I would have 49 cu ft left in each tank, adding a 9 cu ft cushion in each tank.

If I further reduce the "thirds" to 600 psi , I will reduce the pentration gas to 34 cu ft, but I will increase the end of dive reserve to 70 cu ft, and at the turn point, I would have 52 cu ft left in each tank, creating an 18 cu ft cushion for the exit.

In other words, reducing your "third" by 100 to 200 psi will add a significant margin of reserve gas in each tank and will only knock a couple minutes off your bottom time.

What 600 psi thirds would then look like would be switching from the left to right tank when I breathed the left tank down to 1800 psi, then breathing the right tank down to 1800 psi, turning the dive and, staying on the right tank, continue to breathe it down to 1200 psi, before switching back to the left tank and breathing it to 1200 psi, at which point I should either be on the surface or on my first deco gas.

In deco diving, this strategy also leaves 34 cu ft in each tank for deco purposes in the event the deco gas is 'lost' and a large reserve is important as the deco time and gas required on back gas can easily double over a 1 or 2 deco gas schedule.
 
Last edited:
I dive ID and use the 1/3, 2/3, 1/3 technique and all is going very well.
I do not have the concern to reduce the 1/3 for safety as all my dives have no overhead but having a safety margin for deco stops for example is something one have to consider.

The point of having ID is that with your tank bands (whether steel or travel) and your gear you can go dive anywhere with rental tanks (here in Egypt it is not something usual for one to have his own tanks which is a must for having a manifold)
 
Both DA Aquamaster and Solly, have touched on some of the many options IDs provide.
I like that I can "on the fly" change and do 2 short or shallow dives with 2 single 72's. DA Aquamaster I'm not doing any overhead at least for now. I've copied your post and saved it. Thanks for the effort. Deco dives I do usually require I have another bottle somewhere between the bottom and 20fsw because I use lots of gas. Slinging bottles in overhead envro. makes sense to me however, getting thru some of places I've been might take some work.
 
Here's some pix of the ID's mounted and the bands. The bands are the old twin tanks harness type. The slots for the harness and reserve rod holders are visible.

I'm still working on a workable crouch strap. The BC rides up my back when inflated even a little. I want one that will break away if I drop my weight belt but can hold the BC down. Industrial strength Velcro didn't work. I'll figure something out!
 

Attachments

  • IDs front view.jpg
    IDs front view.jpg
    434.7 KB · Views: 52
  • IDs aft view.jpg
    IDs aft view.jpg
    455 KB · Views: 56
  • IDs port view.jpg
    IDs port view.jpg
    456.7 KB · Views: 51
  • IDs strbd view.jpg
    IDs strbd view.jpg
    459.7 KB · Views: 51
  • IDs top view.jpg
    IDs top view.jpg
    420.1 KB · Views: 52
  • vintage bands all ss hardware self locking nuts.jpg
    vintage bands all ss hardware self locking nuts.jpg
    442.5 KB · Views: 44
Here's some pix of the ID's mounted and the bands. The bands are the old twin tanks harness type. The slots for the harness and reserve rod holders are visible.

I'm still working on a workable crouch strap. The BC rides up my back when inflated even a little. I want one that will break away if I drop my weight belt but can hold the BC down. Industrial strength Velcro didn't work. I'll figure something out!

AfterDark,

Thanks for posting the pictures.

Before switching to a BP/W, I was able to "modify" my jacket BC and install a regular waist strap (like on a BP/W).... If there are slots on the lower portion of the plastic backplate in your jacket BC that will accept 2" webbing (and they are the correct height for a waist strap) you should also be able to attach a crotch strap, using the same basic attachment method(s) front & back that you'd use on a BP/W.

Best wishes.
 
Thanks for lead LeadTurn_SD! My BP does have slots for 2" web that the cumber bun goes thru, that'll work out very good!
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom