gajahduduk
Contributor
The dive resort I'm planning to visit does not serve any fish products in order to minimize impact etc. it's a good impulse but am I wrong to think that's extreme? Not consuming reef fish or fish taken illegally from protected waters or using destructive methods, sure. But this resort is in an archipelago whose main food source is seafood. Surely the environmental impact of importing land meat is bad as well? They won't even serve a fish product that is common in the whole country and not produced anywhere near the park waters where the diving is. If I'm not off base in thinking their position is extreme, what evidence can i offer that would encourage them to reconsider this kind of blanket ban on fish products?
Last edited: