Cowfish Aesthetic
Contributor
Hello again.
I know this was a tongue-in-cheek comment but I did not say that. If you go back a couple of posts I said that we have just embarked on a substantial research project to see if oxygen is less narcotic than nitrogen. I think that is a fairly unambiguous admission that we don't know. My point was that Storker's basis for believing that oxygen might be less narcotic is valid. And it is valid.
You are misinterpreting oxygen physiology and the best path to enlightenment here may be to google some basic accounts of oxygen delivery to tissues. Maybe start with the term "oxygen cascade". You will find lots of diagrams like this one:
View attachment 452494
It clearly illustrates that there is a big fall in PO2 from arterial blood to cells in tissue. This still holds even when we breathe high inspired PO2s because increasing the inspired PO2 does not actually increase the carriage of oxygen on hemoglobin much (it is already 97-100% saturated with oxygen when we breathe air) and the solubility of oxygen in the plasma is low. Thus, within the range of PO2s we see in diving there will always be a gradient from arterial blood to tissues like the one you see in the diagram (in fact, the gradient gets even bigger at high PO2s - which is part of the explanation of the so-called oxygen window). In contrast, if you drew a line for nitrogen in the brain on that diagram, after a short wash-in period there would be very little difference between the nitrogen in the alveoli and the tissue nitrogen. THAT is what Storker is saying.
Simon M
I have to say, your willingness to explain the complex science behind diving phenomena is consistently the thing I find most valuable about ScubaBoard.
Last edited: