NWGratefulDiver:I have no issue with your opinion ... your delivery leaves much to be desired.
Fine, then you could separate the two. If you have an issue with my delivery, you could articulate it, and we could discuss the reasons, and maybe I might change it.
Certainly, that would be better than dismissing the message over the delivery.
NWGratefulDiver:And much of what you say is simply unsupportable.
Now you are addressing things directly, rather than merely calling for dismissal of viewa, that is something I'd like to discuss. Could you be more specific?
NWGratefulDiver:I have no interest in trading barbs with you.
Nor I with you. I offered my views, you offered yours, and they may be the basis for a rewarding discussion. I merely took issue with your advising someone to dismiss entire points of view without understanding them. I find this is all too often the approach of from your side of the thread's central issue. People too often respond emotionally to colorful rhetoric like Boogie's without considering the merits of the ideas. There is this overwhelming trend in such discussions for the advocates of quick and easy certification or personal preference as the guiding principle in gear configuration to say "We're nicer, so we're right." I'm tired of that fallacy being paraded around.
I think I was very fair to your point of view, in suggesting that luvspoodles look at both sides of the issues. Then you come in telling her to ignore one side - yeah, I had a problem with that. As the exchange progressed, I saw our messages converging. I don't think that's an accident. I think you do believe in an open minded approach, as much as I do, but you reacted emotionally at first. That's OK, I don't care, but you don't have to maintain that approach.
NWGratefulDiver:But you, of all people, should not be bringing up the topic of put-down ... that seems to be about all you add to this board.
You're mistaken. I'm very careful to avoid ACTUAL personal attacks, but people's perception of what is an attack is somewhat distorted. I've said nothing negative about you, and I've agreed with at least half of what you said. Why don't you try really reading where I've responded to your points, not your person, and giving a substantive response, rather than simply trying to label and insult me.
NWGratefulDiver:You are, and will remain, a complete waste of my time.
That's your personal problem. From where I sit, you've done nothing to demonstrate that you tolerate a differing opinion. I keep hoping you will, because it appears there may be much to learn from you, if you are willing to talk to anyone other than a syncophant.