PV-GS400 Enclosures

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Shasta_man:
meekal: you don't want to go to an MPEG and then compress that in Windows Media Encoder. For an MPEG, a lot of compression happens where color and motion information is removed ........
cool. never thought of it that way... i always figured if it was good enough to make my DVD's it was good enough to 'render'..... will give it a whirl and add it to my 1minTest page (http://piddlefish.servepics.com/SCUBA/video-1minTest.html) in the near future.


ps: thanks for adobe link of information... man-0-man.... that's a regular college course of information!
 
well there ya go.... i've posted the NEWLY rendered video (MSEncoder - DVD Quality - 1Mbps VBR) at http://piddlefish.servepics.com/SCUBA/video-1minTest.html that was derived from an 'original' AVI and *NOT* an MPG.... i dunno... i really can't tell the difference. maybe you guys have better eyes than i do.

it's about 1/2 way down the page.... highlighted in GREEN. let me know what y'all think.
 
What I noticed about my videos were that the colors in the MPEG were a bit more muted and that blue and green was more pronounced. Not the range of colors I saw with the AVI.

Yeah, those primers are full of info, but in a summarized fashion which brings together all of the little pieces of information. I figured out numerous issues from this such as reduced color in my DVDs, upper/lower frames (no problem on a computer screen where images are displayed progressively, but required when creating an MPEG to display on a television, Otherwise it's a jittery during movement), the difference between composite and S video connections.

They also have a good one about compression for the Web.

You have to read them a couple of times. Then all the little pieces and your experiences start making sense.

I used in HD camera from work. I quickly discovered that the volume of data involved in capturing is beyond the capability of most casual users at the moment. Additionally, the increased processing time also will make adoption difficult for the casual user. I had thoughts of stepping up, but the requisite increase in infrastructure requirements and the increased time to process isn't worth it to me. System performance needs to increase to get processing time down and that price point then needs to come down from there.
 
meekal:
well there ya go.... i've posted the NEWLY rendered video (MSEncoder - DVD Quality - 1Mbps VBR) at http://piddlefish.servepics.com/SCUBA/video-1minTest.html that was derived from an 'original' AVI and *NOT* an MPG.... i dunno... i really can't tell the difference. maybe you guys have better eyes than i do.

it's about 1/2 way down the page.... highlighted in GREEN. let me know what y'all think.


HOLY CRAP, WHAT A DIFFERENCE !!!






Just kidding. I don't see a big difference.

You could probably see a difference comparing the original AVI to the MPEG4, but after compressing both down to 9mb, I don't think it matters much. We're talkin' compressing videos down for free internet downloading, not commercial re-sale use.

Just humble opinion. :D
 
ronrosa:
HOLY CRAP, WHAT A DIFFERENCE !!!

Just kidding. I don't see a big difference.

hehehehe - almost got me - i wasn't scrolling fast enough! glad i'm not losing my (mind) sight!
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom