Very rarely will a diver be unsupported when conducting a rescue. There'll normally be people/staff on the boat. IMHO, removing kit in the water isn't critical under those circumstances - one or two grown men can easily haul a diver, with kit, out of the water. In many ways, having the kit in place makes it easier, because there is something to haul on.
IF unsupported and IF the rescuer is considerably outweighed by the victim, then yes... kit removal is something to be considered. IF not, it's a potential waste of time... and best deferred until proven necessary.
Its a cost-benefit analysis of probable time used vs probable time saved right? If the boat is near, then the time saved would likely not be enough to offset time used. If the boat and crew was RIGHT there, then maybe forget about everything and just get them on board for better breaths and compressions.
*slight hijack* Has anyone measured the O2 content of a freaked out, maybe tired, maybe breathing shallowly, probably ascended too quickly, rescuer buddy? I know the textbook answer is 16% but that is on land and maybe even relaxed deep breathing.
An assumption that could kill them.... if breathing shallow/slow and you don't notice that (easy).
That's a very rare thing and tends to involve very cold water. There's too many proven 'cons' and no certain 'pros' to it.
Putting the reg back in was attempting to cover this case. And the dive reflex is almost guaranteed to happen if the water is at least cool. I think around 70F is where it begins to kick in. I dont know if there is some kind of hysteris where its 70ish to turn on, and 75ish to turn off; maybe it turns off and on in a very narrow range. The water's temperature below that changes the speed and intensity of it. The only question is if its enough.
Every rescue course I run involves a stop-watch. Students learn pretty quickly that they don't have time to waste... and a 'few seconds here' and 'a few seconds there' makes a lot of difference over the whole scenario. Enough difference to potentially save, or cost, a life.
That is what I am wondering about; if there is a way to slow the stopwatch. Sorry to bring this from one side of the discussion to the other.
You will, most likly, find a Z knife or shears on their rig and use that to cut off the rig off them. It can be faster than screwing around with buckles.
Great idea, never thought of that one. Though with my regular knife, I might just end up stabbing the guy. Hope he has a better cutter.
3) EMS providers are taught to remove the victim from the hazard, prior to initiating care. Attempting medical procedures in atmospheres not conducive to human life not only adds more difficulty to a procedure with an already grim success rate, but also puts the rescuer at increased risk. A dead rescuer isn't a rescuer at all. They are another victim.
I think I would place myself at a little risk if it was someones only chance. As a non-pro, I would only be "rolling the dice" once or twice in my life as opposed to a pro rescuer who rolls the dice every time they go out.
For all of you who say it takes just a few seconds -- zip/zap -- to take a BCD off a diver don't appear to have:
a. Done this in cold water;
b. Done this with dry gloves (or heavy wet gloves);
c. Done this with a diver in a dry suit; and
d. Done this with a BCD you've never seen before.
It really isn't that easy some times.
You are right, I have never tried in the cold or with cold gear, though ktkt says it is not much harder. But as for point d, maybe add "hey where are your BCD quick releases?" to your insta-buddy check. I might start doing that actually. A few weeks ago I had an instabuddy in a Ranger and I would not have had a clue where anything was, now that I think about it. And as Bob DBF said above, one could use a cutting device.
Some interesting thinking. But keep it just at that. I would be VERY careful about conducting a rescue using unproven/unstudied techniques. CPR has and is been carefully studied and adjusted for best results. These ideas go way outside the bounds of the variations (strip gear, don't, breath through the whole tow, only for a few breaths) being discussed here.
Yeah, saying it was out of the box thinking might not have been enough of a disclaimer. Could have stated "This is a thought experiment, so..." and "dont try this at home." I would not attempt the face down approach if it actually happened near a boat or shore ...yet. But if we did a quarter to a half mile surface swim out, or if I surface and cannot find the boat in any direction....
Somebody give me 2 million dollars. I want to run this experiment. :geek:
:zen: