Not arguing and feel free to PM the answer (to me) but could you go over those reasons again since I am about to purchase this outfit. Best I can see it (S90) has the G11 stomped in the dirt and the G10 is just so yesterday. :blinking: What am I missing here? It uses the wet lenses I have, wet lenses yet to be designed, the Plexi and glass FIX UWL4, multiple lens adapters, compact size, very fast lens, shutter as fast as the G10, same sensor as the G11, the excellent front control ring and rear control rings, decent movie mode, typical battery life, larger LCD screen, very intuitive operation, pocket size even with housing installed. What is not to like? And, it is slightly less money.??
And, like I said before, I was teasing you on the drawing . Our engineers make a CAD drawing in the morning and have the part in their hands that afternoon for test fitting. I don't know why you doubted they were making one? Once they have the drawing, the part is in the bag.
N
As an overall small camera, the S90 is pretty neat. For underwater use, the only tiny issue the G11 has is that it focuses a tiny bit closer. One could argue that the S90 is so small that cold water diving, with gloves would be an issue.
One could also argue that it does not "look" like a "real" camera...
The G10, if you only shoot in ISO 80 or 100, has far better resolution. If you don't shoot iso 80, it sucks (I only shoot at ISO 80... so love it).
After looking at the images, and comparing the S90 versus the G11...I'm getting an S90 to use as my warm water travel camera...I'm with you...