Well no, they didn't just "say so." They tried. Repeatedly. The video evidence is easily obtainable.
Respectfully, did you read my previous post and do you understand what it means?
The tank that failed hydro had significant metal fatigue that resulted in major volume expansion on testing. It was most likely caused by a lengthy high pressure state (8 HRS or more at near 5000+ psi) prior to burst disc failure. That's not video evidence.
My point is that the tank would have failed during filling or use at some point in the future if not removed from service. You CAN cause a tank to fail if exposed to the right conditions. While shooting one with a rifle (which I've actually done, BTW, both steel and aluminum when full) might be dramatic, it's unrealistic.
Realism is this.
Guess Myth Busters missed one, huh?