GF99 is way, way too advanced for me. I tried to read a bit about it, and just got lost. I'm sure I'll get it soon.
I don't totally understand the utility of @+5 as opposed to TTS, but I think it's suppose to let you know if you are going to create additional decompression obligations?
But yes, this is all very helpful. I've got a much better idea how this puzzle is fitting together.
A couple of questions.... PPO2 is PURELY related to depth and not the clock? (99% sure this is correct,) and CNS is the um.... oxygen loading taking into account both pressure and time.... right?
Oh.... and for the record, my instructor sounds more like you, we just ran out of time on the last dive trip. It's padi's BOOK that has me spooked. It says things like "Exceeding 1.6 has the potential for IMMEDIATE ONSET OF OXY TOXICITY" and "OXY TOXICITY CAN COME ON WITH NO WARNING OR SYMPTOMS" ... So answer me this... If you messed up, maybe, got distracted, looked at your computer and saw say, 1.62ppo2, or 1.65ppo2, how worried would you be? What about 1.7?
I don't totally understand the utility of @+5 as opposed to TTS, but I think it's suppose to let you know if you are going to create additional decompression obligations?
But yes, this is all very helpful. I've got a much better idea how this puzzle is fitting together.
A couple of questions.... PPO2 is PURELY related to depth and not the clock? (99% sure this is correct,) and CNS is the um.... oxygen loading taking into account both pressure and time.... right?
Oh.... and for the record, my instructor sounds more like you, we just ran out of time on the last dive trip. It's padi's BOOK that has me spooked. It says things like "Exceeding 1.6 has the potential for IMMEDIATE ONSET OF OXY TOXICITY" and "OXY TOXICITY CAN COME ON WITH NO WARNING OR SYMPTOMS" ... So answer me this... If you messed up, maybe, got distracted, looked at your computer and saw say, 1.62ppo2, or 1.65ppo2, how worried would you be? What about 1.7?