I'm not aborting my dive if my AI fails. I have my primary gage that's not likely to fail and I'd just continue reading it. If they disagree on the amount of air I have I'll abort, but not if it's a clear cut transmitter failure and I lose the link.
I use the AI to note and log tank pressures and in that regards it's very handy. I tend to think the transmitter is more accurate than my SPG is for what that's worth and it reads less than the 250 psi increments my analog gage does. I know I can get gages that read 100 psi but 250 is good enough for me because halfway between is 125 psi.
To answer your question, the computer would not lock up if the transmitter stops.
I've got this stray thought bouncing around in my head, I don't know what to do with it so I'll come out with it.
We rarely have backup depth gages and rely on the computer or gage to provide that data, knowing we'll abort the dive if at any time it fails. We have a similar situation with the ai here, if it fails why not simply abort the dive then and there? You should already have a clue how much air remaining there is, and hopefully you've included your buddies air supply into the figure. So why is it that people freak when you say you've dropped your SPG and use AI only?
In both examples I gave of depth vs air supply you abort when there's a failure so where is the argument I'm not seeing? I'm honestly asking here, I'm probably overlooking something.
For my diving I'll dive with a SPG and I'll treat it as my primary information source with the AI backing it up. If there's a disagreement I'll believe the one with the least amount of air and abort. But why do I do that? Is it because I believe analog will never fail? I know that's not true, I've had analog gages in my plane fail on me. I've had digital give me bad information on the TV's I repair. I kind of rationalize that by having 2 different sources of air pressure I'll have a feel for what's right.
PS, I dive a VT3 and love it.