Hi, one more reason to dive solo is that if you plan your gas following strictly the rules of your training agency, you need to bring more gas if you dive with a buddy ; Because whatever the "what if scenario' you must bring extra gas to assist him ... Diving solo means a simpler gas logistic.
What is your motivation to solo dive?
- Thread starter Litefoot
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Well, you carry your buddy's back-up gas. But, conversely, your buddy carries your back-up gas. So, a solo diver needs to carry his/her own back-up gas.
However, a solo diver will not need to be concerned with having a dive buddy diving a different cylinder than he/she dives, or having a different SAC rate than he/she has, when planning dives.
rx7diver
Not the same. When diving with a buddy you "officially" have to plan for handling a gas loss while sharing air with an AOO buddy on top of it.
For instance while diving 2 tanks, you plan your gas with the possibility of "losing" 1 of your tank and the gas remaining in the last cylinder must be enough for you + your buddy.
If you dive solo, you do not need to consider an AOO diver which simplifies all calculations
Yes, I find it somewhat interesting that a 3L pony is often quoted as being insufficient redundancy (600L assuming 200 bar), but a 12L cylinder midpoint during a dive (let's say 100 bar) is considered just fine for two divers (600L per diver)! Of course, all redundant gas planning should be based on likely requirements.
No, this is not how one plans a recreational buddy dive--so far as I was taught.
For recreational buddy diving, buddies plan to bring both divers to the surface on only one diver's remaining gas supply. That is, you plan for one diver losing access to his/her gas. Then both divers surface using the other diver's remaining gas. For recreational buddy diving, you don't plan for a gas loss beyond this.
rx7diver
@Twiny,
I don't know what this "50 bars rule" is you refer to. Deliberate gas planning for a recreational buddy dive is simple and straightforward and doesn't involve mysterious "rules." Repeating myself, simply plan things so that both divers can surface safely on one diver's remaining gas supply should one diver lose access to his/her gas supply. Simple. No need to complicate this.
Things are really simple if both divers are diving identical cylinders.
rx7diver
OMyMyOHellYes
Contributor
Dive buddies make it difficult to dive with a buddy.
Cthippo
Contributor
I think this whole argument is kind of moot, or at least should be. In buddy diving you are assuming single tank for each diver and a need to maintain a reserve in case of emergency. That reserve comes out of your back gas supply and repeesents gas that you cannot use.
Conversely, with solo diving you should be carrying redundant air that you already don't plan to use.
The apples to apples comparison would be solo diving on single tank versus buddy diving on single tanks. It only becomes an issue if you are trying to squeeze every last psi out of a tank.
@Cthippo,
No argument here. To me this boils down to: When recreational buddy diving the way I was taught (and the way I do it) your buddy carries your back-up gas (emergency gas). When solo diving, you carry your own back-up gas (emergency gas)--if you choose to, however you choose to, your choice.
rx7diver
Similar threads
