MadDog
I understand what you are saying about the manufacturers intentions. The hotshoe, the viewfinder and the more rugged construction make the G11 more like a DSLR. But if Im only planning to use the camera underwater and to use fiberoptics for the flash, then the viewfinder and hotshoe wouldnt seem to be much use. And the housing should determine its ruggedness. And the flip out screen wont help much either. There is the zoom length of 140 mm versus 105 mm: But from your input on our other thread, I gather that I am unlikely to want to zoom that far.
Apart from housing issues, the only advantages of the G11 that I can find left are:
1) A dedicated ISO dial, Exposure control dial and an exposure lock button. And not having to rely on the inconvenient gear on the front of the S90 housing for the lens ring. All of which might be really useful.
2) Some (vague) reports that the optics of the S90 lens are inferior to those of the G11 (which I doubt I would be able to notice).
Now: To weight those two against the smaller cheaper S90 with a slightly larger screen, a lens that is one stop faster and a much easier configuration for wide angle wet mount lenses.
Two questions:
1) Am I missing any other advantages of the G11?
2) On our other thread (about the Patima Housing), you said that I would be unlikely to want to zoom out as far as 140mm on G11. Would that remain true if I started using wet mount macro lenses? I really am much more interested in macro.
Rob