Scubadiver888 brings up an interesting point about the relative conservatism of certain computers. One of the instructors on the boat that I dive with regularly told me that she got a new computer the other week, and two thirds of the way through a routine dive (1st of a two tank dive that all dive instructors do 5 out of the 7 days in a week in the British Virgin Islands) it was telling her to make an immediate ascent and do emergency decompression. So she went home and chucked it in the bin (so she said - more likely she sold it on eBay).
Is there any published data on which dive computers take more and less conservative approaches to the nitrogen absorbtion algorythms?
scubadiving.com has reviews of specific computers. They talk about the algorithm each computer uses then they show graphs of how efficient they work, etc.
Have a look at 10 new dive computers. This is the latest review from scubadiving.com. You can see in the summary which computers use which algorithm. E.g. RGBM, Haldanean, Buhlmann.
There is a chance the computer the dive instructor 'chucked' was probably defective. A good, conservative dive computer would give you more warning.
P.S. can you recommend any good dive operators in the BVI? I don't want to dive the Rhone again. I'm probably going to Tortola next year but want to dive Virgin Gorda. So I'm looking for someone who can pick me up in Torola and bring me to a site in Virgin Gorda. If you want to move this to a more appropriate thread just let me know where you replied, or email me at darrell dot grainger at gmail dot com. Thanks.