TSandM:It's interesting that some people prefer to read a digital display. There are actually some studies (can't remember where) showing that analog information is more quickly and more accurately perceived, which is one of the reasons why speedometers almost all remain analog.
While I'm sure this is true, I'm not sure the conclusion that follows (namely analogue gauges are preferable) necessarily follows from the observation. When you're flying at Mach speed....ok....
For diving digital gauges give you information in much finer resolution than you generally perceive in analogue. I don't know if you can read your pressure in 1/2 bar increments on an analogue gauge but you can on a digital one....
I had an air-integrated computer, and I never paid any attention to the "air time remaining" part of the display.
I only looked at it once and thought....yeah, whatever.
I guess I dove for too long on tables to be bothered with a lot of the information the computer gives me. I generally look first at depth. I use bottom time to navigate with so I have a good feeling for my bottom time, profile and the NDL at any point on a typical dive. That's the benefit of diving without a computer for a long time. I know the PADI table by heart. Generally speaking by the time I look at the NDL it's just telling me what I already knew....
R..