DevonDiver
N/A
Jim, you'd really be interested in drafting the dubious talents of an instructor who cannot follow the standards he signs up for?
I think you must understand many of my feelings about PADI's recreational diving syllabus.. but...but... for as long as I teach within the auspices of that syllabus, I am ethically bound to adhere to it. Anything less is unprofessional. The ethical option remains for me to look for alternative syllabus - and with that option available, ignoring my current operating standards shouldn't be regarded as laudable.
From my own experiences, many of those instructors who illegitimately push 'high-intensity', quasi-military, training drills into their recreational diving classes rarely do so for the student's benefit. In many instances, it is purely to bolster their own egos and/or create an illusion of superiority or 'elitism'.
There is just as many potential failings and dangers in over-demanding a student as there is with under-demanding them.
As others have mentioned, the training programs conducted 30 years ago were taught by a very different breed of instructor under very different circumstances. Most of those men were ex-military divers, who were in the process of actually defining and shaping the recreational diving system through the evolution and adaptation of their military diving training. Likewise, those people who enrolled on their courses were also generally very different to today's dive trainees.
Trying to 'emulate' the teaching of 3 decades ago is not going to work if the instructor and students concerned don't share the experience, mind-set and culture of those times. Few do now.
The defining and shaping of recreational scuba training didn't end 30 years ago... for better and/or worse... the evolution continued until we reached today's standards. Tomorrow's standards will, again, be different to today's. Whilst we can certainly benefit from assessing older methods of training, we should not presume that they are better, or worse, in the modern environment.
I think you must understand many of my feelings about PADI's recreational diving syllabus.. but...but... for as long as I teach within the auspices of that syllabus, I am ethically bound to adhere to it. Anything less is unprofessional. The ethical option remains for me to look for alternative syllabus - and with that option available, ignoring my current operating standards shouldn't be regarded as laudable.
From my own experiences, many of those instructors who illegitimately push 'high-intensity', quasi-military, training drills into their recreational diving classes rarely do so for the student's benefit. In many instances, it is purely to bolster their own egos and/or create an illusion of superiority or 'elitism'.
There is just as many potential failings and dangers in over-demanding a student as there is with under-demanding them.
As others have mentioned, the training programs conducted 30 years ago were taught by a very different breed of instructor under very different circumstances. Most of those men were ex-military divers, who were in the process of actually defining and shaping the recreational diving system through the evolution and adaptation of their military diving training. Likewise, those people who enrolled on their courses were also generally very different to today's dive trainees.
Trying to 'emulate' the teaching of 3 decades ago is not going to work if the instructor and students concerned don't share the experience, mind-set and culture of those times. Few do now.
The defining and shaping of recreational scuba training didn't end 30 years ago... for better and/or worse... the evolution continued until we reached today's standards. Tomorrow's standards will, again, be different to today's. Whilst we can certainly benefit from assessing older methods of training, we should not presume that they are better, or worse, in the modern environment.