Wow! In all my time here have I never been so throughly chastised. Rhone Man must have really crawled up your arse correcting your grammar (which is pretty bad) that you had to unload on me huh? Thanks firstdive2005!
firstdive2005:
Take a chill??? Did you read what you wrote?
firstdive2005:
Who are you to say that peoples ramblings about their holidays on Coz is unjustified?
When did I say that? I never said anything that people need not give their trip reports. I love trip reports and feel that they have been scarcely lacking lately. I was only suggesting the above as a template for posts contained within a sticky that would concisely review dive operators providing additional information about the reviewer so that people reading the reivew will have some objectivity. That way, if people wanted to just get info about op's they could easily find it. Not that you've spent enough time here to know just how frequently people ask who the best op is without searching.
firstdive2005:
Why are you saying people have to be clinical in their review?
Again, I'm only suggesting they be concise in their op review that would become a part an evolving sticky, NOT their trip report.
firstdive2005:
You are chasing people from this forum and board away.
Oh really? Yet you're still here!
firstdive2005:
We all have personal info we can input on our data on this board if we want. Lots of people like to read the ramblings. It's like a sit down at the pub or over coffee. If YOU dont like it dont freaking read it.
Oh, I do but thanks for allowing me the option.
firstdive2005:
I've got one but thanks for the suggestion.
firstdive2005:
This board got big because of it. Quit being the better mouse trap builder. It works just fine and tons of info is dispersed. A lot of info needs correcting, such as streets or names of bars, restaurants, hotels etc. But trying to relegate how people put their vacation and their review on here is none of your business!!!!!!!!!!!
You're right, I don't care where people put their vacations.
firstdive2005:
Just think everything is perfect because of your review sheet.
Nope and I never said so. It's open for suggestions.
firstdive2005:
We will never need to hear from the likes of O, um say Christi, or any other op owner that contributes here. That would be bad, they add so much. So just add your 02 when asked or if you have some good info on Coz. Leave the way people choose to input want they want to let you know alone. If more info is wanted people will ask, thats called conversation on the internet.
That's called conversation in any setting not just the internet!
So I took all the advice you had for me, here is a little in return:
Use the M-QUOTE feature to place multiple quotes within one post instead of spamming the thread with a bunch of repeated responses.
Edit the quotes to simply respond to what is relevant in the post you're quoting.
Be sure to read all the posts in a thread before chastising someone because you don't have the whole story or all the details of the intended post. If in any doubt, don't make a scathing post if in the end you end up looking like a total ass!
ggunn:
The problem I see with this approach is, as Marg and others have pointed out, that very few divers have gone out with more than a few Cozumel dive ops, which makes any comparisons they (we) draw between dive ops subject to bias based on limited experience. Beyond that, I think that a system like that invites and encourages contentiousness between dive ops and between divers. I vote "no".
Fair enough and I felt the same especially in regards people divulging the price they paid per thank. I could see where someone could make an error and another client come along and question the op about it. I only offered it as a solution allowing people to cheer lead for their favorite op or attempt to destroy one after a bad experience but getting more information about the reviewer. YMMV