mtg
Guest
miked:To what extent is a "real" (vs deliberately sunk) wreck someone's final resting place??
I have heard people accuse "souvenir takers" of being grave robbers. IMO that is a bit extreme, but it depends on too many variables to get into here.
Any thoughts?
Still covered for me by the leave it alone principle. However as I have mentioned (here - elsewhere?) I feel if you go through the expense of finding a wreck and (under maritime law) removing items of value its your thing. Will the original country of ownership fight for those objects? probably. Is it as tasteless as digging up somebody's grave and taking stuff? no.
I do think that THE WRECK ITSELF should be left alone structurally. No spike removal, porthole robbing, etc. If every visitor took something, very soon you'd have nothing to see. I've heard the argument that the wrecks are disintigrating anyway; well mountains erode every day, too - doesn't mean you'll catch me screaching down one on my mountain bike digging up the trail and adding to it.