Neoprene advantages:Did you guys go Neoprene or trilam ? I have also been considering going dry this year and not sure if I should go with Neoprene or Trilam ? I have been looking at the Mares icefit. neoprene
- Cheaper
- Thermal protection and buoyancy when flooded
- more streamlined
Trilam advantages:
- easier care
- easier to patch
- doesn't change buoyancy with depth due to suit compression
- superior seals
- dry glove option (there may be dry glove options for neoprene but I've never seen that myself)
I dove a neoprene for about a decade, and I've been diving my trilam for nearly as long. All in all I prefer the trilam, especially because I could never get a really dry seal with the neoprene - always had a little moisture on the lower arms and usually had a little near the neck. With the trilam it only leaks if I screw up.
On the other hand, if you're going to dive really cold water with a long way to warmth - distance or deco - realize that a flooded trilam can mean death from exposure a whole lot quicker than a flooded neoprene.
---
The Icefit (which I've never seen) appears to be a pretty neat compromise. It's apparently crushed neoprene, so it shouldn't give you the variable buoyancy problems of a regular 7mil, but it's only 4mil, so it'll give less thermal protection if flooded, and the pre-crushing eliminates most of the inherent buoyancy that could be an advantage in a flood but is a disadvantage in regular use.. It comes with a latex seal option, which means good seals and the dry-glove option. It should be a pretty tough suit. I don't have a feel for patching crushed neoprene.
Anybody want to send me one for evaluation???
Rick