eelnoraa
Contributor
I have similar personal experience with Dr Lector as well.
Out of the wing I have, I only managed to pinch the DSS wing. It is not DSS's false. But the same usage, H and Oxycheq haven't had issue.
In term of toughness, I must say Oxcheq's outter shell is way over the top. It very thick and very stiff. It is impossbile to pinch the bladder throught the shell. H and DSS use similar outter material, both are flexible and foldable, which I prefer.
In term of inner bladder, Huses coated nylon (think Halcyon SMB material), which appears to be very robust. Both Oxycheq and DSS use urathane bladder, but Oxycheq's is thicker. Oxycheq's bladder implementation is also not very good. It is basically hugely oversize. The bladder is folded in side on all edges. This in pratice make dumping a Oxy wing noticeably slower than the other two.
DRIS wing use similar but thinner material than H and DSS, intermal bladder is urathane. PM me if you want to know who makes it.
Out of the wing I have, I only managed to pinch the DSS wing. It is not DSS's false. But the same usage, H and Oxycheq haven't had issue.
In term of toughness, I must say Oxcheq's outter shell is way over the top. It very thick and very stiff. It is impossbile to pinch the bladder throught the shell. H and DSS use similar outter material, both are flexible and foldable, which I prefer.
In term of inner bladder, Huses coated nylon (think Halcyon SMB material), which appears to be very robust. Both Oxycheq and DSS use urathane bladder, but Oxycheq's is thicker. Oxycheq's bladder implementation is also not very good. It is basically hugely oversize. The bladder is folded in side on all edges. This in pratice make dumping a Oxy wing noticeably slower than the other two.
DRIS wing use similar but thinner material than H and DSS, intermal bladder is urathane. PM me if you want to know who makes it.