Hi,
I'm getting a feeling of re-inventing the wheel.
If you run Google Earth (the local client - not the online google maps), then in layers, select "Ocean->Ocean Sports->Dive Spots" you should see quite a few dive site labels. Their data is pulled from
- Wannadive.net - World dive site atlas and is by no means complete. It relies on user submissions, and could probably do with its database being more filterable, but I think it is approaching the point where it has enough of a following and entries to one day, become the definitive dive site bible.
Hth
Bill
Great site, Bill. I note:
The idea is for a crowd sourced dive atlas. How similar that is to the OP's idea is for him to decide. Certainly, this is something to benchmark against.
If the data is patchy, this is exactly the problem with web 2.0 community stuff. You need a critical mass of users. How do you get them - especially as a startup facing veteran players? This site seems better visited than most, and if it is integrated with Google earth has a pretty significant leg-up. So the $64k question is why would I go to a different site trying to do the same thing rather than contribute to this site, which is at least already partly populated?
There ARE answers to that, but the question is important. First mover advantage is powerful, but the internet rewards innovative, smart takes on new ideas. Other ways to get leverage include clever partnerships. Why not cut scubaboard in on the action, for example? Create a satellite site that adds richness here and profit-share? OP gets the community in return - which is where the value is.
I would be surprised if this site was revenue-positive yet, given the advertising model it is running with. To its advantage here is it is part of a suite of similar sites (wannasurf, wannaskydive, etc), amortizing development costs over several potential platforms and helping prop up loss-leading assets.
I'd be surprised, on that point, if scubaboard was massively revenue-positive itself. Monetizing web communities is, as I said earlier, tricksy. Especially if you're not already an expert, but just a mom-and-pop kinda operation starting out.
OP, this is part of why I reckon a book is lower risk and more manageable than a web site if you're not already well skilled in web development stuff. I guess it's an opportunity to learn heaps, though, if you're up for it! Bear in mind that a web site often requires you to put money in, whereas a traditional publishing arrangement means the publisher is putting up the development costs, and you just sit back and get paid. That might be a factor to consider also.