Rich, it's just flat out not true. Oceanography 101 bro.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I don't understand this post. I would guess that 95% of divers are rec divers only. Are you trying to pick a fight?
Most of my dives are in 25'-30' but I've dove plenty of "tech" dives too. Are you limiting yourself to above 80' because you believe beyond 80' is an unnecessary risk? If so, good for you, it is a good thing to define acceptable risk for yourself. How did you come to settle on 80'?
---------- Post added December 8th, 2014 at 08:20 PM ----------
I could believe 90% of marine species, but I wouldn't believe 90% of biomass.
You wrote in your original post that you didn't see the need to go deeper. People can still read that. And now you say you're a tech diver? Which is it?
While everyone is free to choose his or her own dive preferences, it's human nature to be curious about & question the preferences of others. What do people see in wrecks? Why do people dive cold water? Why did somebody do over 500 dives in a quarry? Etc… As long as the question is raised respectfully, seems legit.
Richard.
Rich, it's just flat out not true. Oceanography 101 bro.