10tigers,
I don't think there is any argument against taking instruction to become a better diver under the supervision of a pro. The problem lies in the specific application of those skills. It's like taking a class in school. If I take calculus in school and get an "A" or I get a "C", it really doesn't determine whether or not I am going to be able problem solve when I get that engineering job at the firm. Similarly, just because I can follow my instructor to 150ft, and do a decompression dive, it doesn't mean that I am going to be able to save my own life when everything goes wrong 6 months later on a dark, cold dive in the northeast. Practical application comes only through experience.
Getting back to something TSandM said:
If you make it impossible for someone to do AOW before they have completed a certain number of post-certification dives, what do you do with the person who gets passed out of OW without the skills to DO those dives (me)?
There is nothing wrong with you asking an instructor to assist you for a weekend outside of a classroom. There doesn't have to be a certification involved. This is basic mentoring and it's something I am trying to do with my diving. I think it's more prevalent in technical diving, but it certainly can be done in recreational diving too. What's wrong with asking that instructor with 1000 dives, "Hey Bob, I'm not really solid on the water. Can you do a few dives with me next weekend and check me out? I'll pay for gas and lunch, and drop a few bucks in your pocket if you can help me."
What ever happened to simply trying to become BETTER at something without having to get a certification card? I've been away from diving in open water for 11 years. I would no sooner sign up for AOW right now than try to go to the moon. Instead, I am getting in the pool 3 times a week working my skills on my own until I feel more comfortable. I will ask some of my more experienced friends to come check me out to see if I'm doing things well, and then I'll hit the open water again.
I think the crux of this discussion comes down to whether it is ultimately the responsibility of the Agency, the instructor, or the student, to demand proficiency before being certified to some level. Truthfully, I feel it's the responsibility of all three. However, I feel it's the agency that sets the overall standard and gives teeth to the instuctor's ability to say, "According to my agency's guidelines, you are not yet prepared for this level of diving. And I think the instructor needs to be able to say that BEFORE or AFTER the class. If a student signs up for intro to cave, yet cannot control their buoyancy or trim, they do not even need to be offered the class. By the same token, if a student is unaware (or even if they are) that their skills are not adequate to go forward, they need to be told that, and told what is lacking.
I think one of the reasons the DIRF class gets *SO* much mileage here on SB, is because it is a stop-gap class designed to bridge the gulf between OW/AOW and technical diving. I don't know if there is a card for passing the class, but it shouldn't matter. It is strictly about becoming a better diver. I would like to see more agencies adopt this type of "workshop" but I think they fear it because it might well point out that they are not getting quality students through OW and AOW.
And let's face facts. Most divers don't really care that they are not proficient. They just want to go diving from time to time. We are the fervent 1% here on this board and are not really representative of the sport as a whole.
Just the way I see it...