I am not a big fan of the baby shampoo (or baby poo either for that matter:mooner. I have used it on a few occations while diving with operators that offered it. While it did work, the fine viscosity of the liquid migrated in between the mask's frame and the lens. This leaves a white film...that IMHO just looks bad and is a reflection on how I take care of my gears (good equipment maintenance = good functioning equipment = someone who cares for their gear).
I use Sea Gold Gel. I know that $4.50 is a lot to spend in this economy, when $1.50 shampoo is a functional alternative...especially since I will be spending $1000s just to get to the dive sites, but damn it Gumbie, my mask is darn well worth the Sea Gold Gel and not have to wear that nasty white film.
To the OP on the design of a multiple pane mask...I agree with some of the previous posts; I think weight will become an issue and it will not replace the environmental parameters inside the mask. But at least you are thinking of new and improved ways to enhance diving.
~ME~
I use Sea Gold Gel. I know that $4.50 is a lot to spend in this economy, when $1.50 shampoo is a functional alternative...especially since I will be spending $1000s just to get to the dive sites, but damn it Gumbie, my mask is darn well worth the Sea Gold Gel and not have to wear that nasty white film.
To the OP on the design of a multiple pane mask...I agree with some of the previous posts; I think weight will become an issue and it will not replace the environmental parameters inside the mask. But at least you are thinking of new and improved ways to enhance diving.
~ME~
Last edited: