They require calibration, have various user modes that display different information (ascent rates, altitude history, temperature history, etc etc), have scrollable histories, allow you to program certain workouts, etc.3dent:I'm not familiar with either. What user input does mountaneering wrist computer have?
IMO, it's not marketing driven. There's a very fundamental difference between a gauge (even a digital one) and a dive computer.3dent:I guess my view is not that we shouldn't call computers computers, but that maybe we should call digital depth gauges computers as well.
As The Kraken observed, this is just a mental exercise on a slow day.
However, I've seen people on this board quick to make a distinction, or point out the 'mistake' when someone calls a computer a gauge, or vice-versa, and I don't understand why it's such a big deal.
The terminology is probably all just driven by marketing, just like everything else.
A computer tells you *how much time you have left*, which it works out through a complex theoretical algorithm, which is sometimes adjustable by the user. A depth gauge, whether mechanical or digital, uses a direct function and only displays elapsed time and/or depth.
There is no fundamental difference between a digital depth gauge and a mechanical depth gauge.. but there is a fundamental difference between either of those and a computer, which purports to tell you how to dive.. ie, it performs some intelligent function.
I think it's important to have "gauge" and "computer" separate terms.. I wouldn't want to call a digital depth gauge a "computer" and a mechanical one a "depth gauge" just because one runs on electronics. Divers are much better served by calling them different things.