Is Deep Air / Light Deco (bounce?) Discussible on ScubaBoard?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Hahaha. ROTFL. A recreational deep diving expert?

Is that the guy who does all of those deep dives without the benefit of having proper knowledge, skills or equipment for the dives he is doing?

Yes... I think you guessed it. How else would Halemano justify his uninformed contributions and claim to be authoritative on topics in which he is neither trained, nor experienced.


For the record, I am a 'recreational particle physics expert'... and a 'recreational commercial pilot expert'.
That means I watch 'Big Bang Theory' on TV... and used to play Microsoft Flight Sim when I was a kid.. LMAO.
 
I have mentioned this a few times on narcosis and dead brain cells and there is no knowledge really from some very involved diving docs and diving scientist as I would call them like Morgan Wells and Karl Huggins.

Ok so what I did do this past summer is do repetive deep dives and had no Problems what so ever after dives, now remember in front of my house I have an awesome place to dive that has shallows to do some great 1 to 2 atm diving that i enjoy on my Inflatable boat even after deep air/bounce diving.

Off topic what i did notice from going dry from wet for so long is that my skin on ball of foot is starting to change back to when you live on land and wear shoes, I like my feet like a baby's ass, so I did do a wet dive today, just a short and shallow one.
 
I guess I am really just baffled by you professional recreational diving instructors that seem to have a problem with folks like me who think that any diver thinking of venturing even further than the standards (which I find in many situations to be not only arbitrary but also sketchy), to get additional information on how to plan and execute those dives as the training these divers have taken in the past are likely to be woefully inadequate to prepare them for what they might be getting into.

I guess I'm really just baffled by you quoting Thal 3 times, typing directly to those Thal quotes in 12 paragraphs, and then ending with the above paragraph. If you are still typing directly at Thal with this 13th paragraph, do you know who Thal is?

No matter if you are or are not typing directly at Thal in the above quoted 13th paragraph, perhaps you expect the recreational instructor or instructors who cause you to use the word "instructorS" to read your mind as to which of us you are typing at?

Now, as to the actual statement itself; I guess we can assume how it should really read; "needs" needs to go where -- is, right?

"I guess I am really just baffled by you professional recreational diving instructors that seem to have a problem with folks like me who think that any diver thinking of venturing even further than the standards -- to get additional information on how to plan and execute those dives as the training these divers have taken in the past are likely to be woefully inadequate to prepare them for what they might be getting into.

Baffled does not completely describe my state of bewilderment at most of your posts in this thread; especially this one. This thread is about getting those in need divers that additional information that you seem to think someone has a problem with you thinking people should be getting.

ScubaBoard has caused me to be "deep curious", with all the threads on the subject since the Coz tragedy, and I will not be using Helium if I dive deeper than I have in the past. Did you notice how Moonglow's post, post #3, was not challenged by anybody?

...Second, deep air dives (bounce) are done safely thousands of times a day worldwide...

Do you think all those thousands of daily deep air bounce dives are being made "only" by divers who have the training or experience necessary to be making those dives?

I think the vast majority of divers making those thousands of daily deep air bounce dives do not have the training or experience necessary to be making those dives.

In the world wide scheme of things, a very, very small percentage of those dives result in injury, and even less in death.

I think that vast majority of under prepared divers are NEVER even going to consider the training that Tech divers think would be appropriate for those dives, in a large part because Tech divers do not think the way those dives are made is appropriate from the get go.

I think that vast majority of underprepared divers are NEVER going to see this thread, because the vast majority of divers who do those dives don't frequent ScubaBoard.

ScubaBoard can pretty much only help divers who frequent ScubaBoard, so of the divers who do those dives and frequent ScubaBoard I think considerably more of them will at most be frequenting forums other than Tech.

I think the "just say no" posts on ScubaBoard might sell some Tech training, and some Tech gear, but for the most part to divers who were not going to make those dives anyway, but the problem of mostly under prepared divers making thousands of deep air bounce dives daily is pretty much still the same problem with the "just say no" silliness, because in case you haven't noticed, "just say no" silliness has never worked worth a damn.

Having this conversation is my way of trying to get useful information to the ScubaBoard frequenters who most need some useful information. Since we are not allowed to have this conversation in the forums I think most of the most in need of the information frequent, the best way to get them to see it seem to me to be keeping this thread in the most viewed threads promo box.

:idk:
 
The issue (discussions on SB) has to be conducted in the context of major training agencies. In respect of recreational training, IANTD is hardly a 'major' agency.

It is, however, a long-standing technical focused agency. No prizes for seeing the link between 'expanded' recreational diving and the convenient progression into their tech program.

Which of their 'recreational' or 'sport' courses actually qualify for 50% O2 and ~10 mins deco? The Advanced Nitrox course?

Every tec agency has AN, or equivalent. The rest of them classify that as part of their tech range, rather than rec. IANTD are now going with the word sport? So basically, they are using the word to differentiate with commercial, military or scientific diving (everything else - leisure diving - is 'sport')?

For example: blah blah blah

So, as far as I can see, quite a few of you are now no longer able to read all the words I type, or you now can not comprehend the entire wording.

For starters, IANTD has only been in existence for 19 years. I started scuba diving 26 years before IANTD was formed. To me it is not necessarily long-standing. 10 years ago, when I became a scuba instructor, these were the first four entries on the Standards page titled Definitions and Terms used by IANTD (page 11);

IANTD 2001:
Recreational Diving - all forms of diving intended for recreational purposes or instruction of recreational divers, in which the diver has the option to dive. This includes both the most popular form of recreational diving, sport diving; as well as technical diving, which is an advanced form of recreational diving.

Sport Diving - the most common form of recreational diving. Sport diving is performed using either air or Nitrox mixtures up to 50% oxygen on dives no deeper than 130 feet (39 meters).Sport divers may not engage in dives requiring a total of more than 10 minutes of decompression time, or dives with stops deeper than 20 feet (6 meters).

Technical Diving - an advanced form of recreational diving utilizing skills techniques, equipment and knowledge beyond the requirements of sport diving Technical diving includes, but is not limited to, dives deeper than 130 feet (39 meters), dives into overhead environments beyond a visible exit point, dives using mixed gas (in addition to sport diving EANx mixtures) and dives requiring staged decompression.

Commercial Diving - a form of diving, excluding instruction, where the diver works for hire and his/her employment depends on a willingness to dive.

In that 2001 IANTD Sport Diving Manual, just inches from the keyboard I am typing on, page 13 of Standards is the beginning of Sport Diver Programs, page 49 is the beginning of Technical Diver Programs, and page 29 is the Standards page for Advanced EANx Diver.

:idk:

My post you seem to be arguing against does not contain the argument you are arguing against. You need to re-read that post; I have not mistyped. By the 2001 IANTD Standards, Advanced EANx Diver was not a Technical diving certification, it was a Sport diving certification. You may also need to re-read the IANTD quote you post because I read Sport diving and Technical diving as separate there as well.

Now, from the 2001 IANTD Advanced EANx Diver Standards page (page 29).

IANTD 2001:
E. Equipment Requirements
....1. A safety or decompression gas cylinder (if used), rigged as either a pony or stage cylinder. Gas cylinders must be oxygen clean and oxygen serviceable where needed.

F. Program Limits
....1. There may be no more than 4 students per instructor. This ratio may be increased by 2 for each assisting DM, up to max 8 students
....2. No dives may be conducted to depths greater than 130 feet (39 meters).
....3. All dives must be conducted using EANx (maximum 40% oxygen). A higher EANx (maximum 50% oxygen) may be used at the decompression or safety stops.
....4. All appropriate safety or decompression stops must be performed.
....5. Decompression stops are limited to a maximum of 10 minutes and 20 feet (6 meters).

I did not maintain my active IANTD status for many years, as my PADI OWSI was all that was necessary to maintain dive instructor employment in Hawaii, so I do not know when IANTD Standards changed, but there are for sure IANTD Advanced EANx divers who were certified during the years these Standards were in effect and those divers most likely don't consider their IANTD Advanced EANx Diver certification to be a Technical diving certification, because IANTD didn't consider it to be a Technical diving certification.

Hence the last part of my post you argue nowhere against.

halemanō;6114872:
So it seems there could be more than a few divers out there, even in North America, who do not consider themselves Tech divers, but have equivalent training to divers who consider themselves Tech divers.

It seems there could be divers for whom letting their Suunto computer show an ASC time of 17 minutes @ 130' is not a violation of their non Tech training.

After being certified to the level of IANTD Advanced EANx Divers, is a single air cylinders buddy team not diving within their non Tech training @ 130' with less than 18 minutes ASC time showing on both divers Suunto Viper computers?

:idk:

Further more, if you click on the IANTD web link you provide, and then click on Technical, Advanced EANx is not listed on the Technical page.

:idk:
 
Last edited:
halemanō;6115359:
Further more, if you click on the IANTD web link you provide, and then click on Technical, Advanced EANx is not listed on the Technical page.

...and (as I mentioned explicitly in my last post - which you ignored) neither is it mentioned on the Recreational page.

IANTD is a peculiarity, because it keeps nitrox separate (both basic & advanced) from the rec and tec programmes.

However, every other agency includes it as level 1 tech.... and that's where the IANTD AN course would be held as an equivalent (and vice versa).
 
I have been deep on air many times (40M plus); deepest dive 53m; I personally know people who regularly dive 60m +. I have always taken extra care when diving below 30m; backup computer; pony tank, tank and reg tied at 5m to decompress on if low on air etc. I get narced around 40m and really silly at 50m, I know that diving much deeper than this is on air frankly stupid, perhaps that's why BSAC set their deepest air dives at 50m. Over 55m your Oxygen partial pressure starts to become a concern too. Once you are in a deco dive you have to consider that it's like having an overhead obstruction, like being in a cave or wreck; if you are not equipped or trained for this then you are taking an unacceptable risk. If you train for this, make successive dives just 2m deeper each time, and equip yourself properly with backup systems then I don't see a problem with diving to a maximum of 55m, beyond that is just crazy stupid on air.
 
You see some sort of demarcation between recreational diving and tech diving. Given your complete lack of technical training, I suppose that's not too surprising. There is none. It's a continuum of knowledge and skills mastery ... equally applicable whether I'm doing a 20-foot reef dive or a 200-foot wreck dive. The difference isn't in knowledge, planning or execution ... it's in the resources needed to achieve the objective.

I don't "chase people off" ScubaBoard ... I argue my positions on topics ... which you're free to disagree with as passionately as you please. It is your choice ... just as it is mine ... to participate or not. You keep coming up with these whacky notions that a bunch of us get together and collaborate to keep yours and other voices from being heard. Get real ... this is an internet forum ... nothing more than entertainment. If people don't choose to hear you it's because they read your posts and decide they're not worth hearing. Nothing more ... nothing less.

We all create our own credibility ... nobody else does that for us.

I didn't expect an answer ... except for a bit of name-dropping, you don't seem to know much, really ... certainly you never offer anything substantive to suggest that you actually know what you're doing.

I think your idea of "recreational expert" is someone who drops in the water and hopes for the best ...

Are you paying attention to anyone posting in this thread????

Andy has been pedantic about the fact that as far as SB discussion goes, there is definitely a demarcation between recreational and tech diving. As far as IANTD is concerned, there is a definite demarcation between recreational and technical, as far as PADI is concerned there is a demarcation between recreational and technical. Pray do tell us; as far a NAUI is concerned is there not a demarcation between recreational and technical. We are typing in the Technical Diving forum, which includes a bunch of Technical diving sub forums.

:idk:

Who said you chase people off ScubaBoard? I propose entertaining theories that pretty much only possibly imply culpability, and then you seem to jump up and "own them" whether you were even remotely implied as culpable or not; that's part of what makes 'em so entertaining.

I'm pretty sure most who half read this thread know the answer to my first Q in this post, before you made the post I'm quoting in this post.

You sure do a lot of thinking for me.

About OceanEd

Biography:
Padi Course Director since 1976. Spent 15 years as PADI's Regional Manager for Europe, Africa, Middle East. Past NAUI Course Director. Past Instructor Trainer for Israeli Diving Federation, CMAS 3 Star Instructor, BSAC 2 Star Instructor, etc.

Occupation:
I was PADI's International Regional Manager for 15 years, later I was Director of Diving Programs for Patrick Air Force Base. I am presently the head of diving instruction for ScubaWorks in Jupiter, Florida

Certification Agencies:
PADI, NAUI, CMAS, BSAC, FUAI, etc.

Dive History:
Raised by a Grandfather who was an Oceanographer. Have been diving for 54 years.

Spent 15 years traveling and diving all over the world setting up PADI in 28 different countries.

Spend an additional 12 years cruising in different parts of the world on my 42 ft. catamaran, diving and exploring.

Certification History:
Past NAUI Course Director. Past Course Director for the Israel Diving Federation. Present PADI Course Director and used to be a PADI IE Examiner. I am also a 3 Star Instructor with CMAS & BSAC

Certification Level:
PADI Course Director

# of Logged Dives:
5,000 - ∞
 
No, there have been no fatalities amongst those trained in Scripps Model programs whilst doing deep diving, period, none, and our records (including dive logs) go back to 1952. I use that as a base because all recreational diving training finds it's origins in the scientific diving community and all recreational training was once identical to what we were doing at time (and still do), 100 hrs and 12 dives (thus rather similar to OW, AOW, Rescue and a few specials).
Using Scripps standards ...

- at what point are divers "allowed" to go to 150 feet? (i.e. how many and what type of dives are considered prerequisite?)
- does Scipps encourage the use of air at that depth?
- what are Scipps equipment requirements for that depth?
- what, if any, personnel support are recommended or required for that depth?

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
halemanō;6115388:
Are you paying attention to anyone posting in this thread????

Andy has been pedantic about the fact that as far as SB discussion goes, there is definitely a demarcation between recreational and tech diving. As far as IANTD is concerned, there is a definite demarcation between recreational and technical, as far as PADI is concerned there is a demarcation between recreational and technical. Pray do tell us; as far a NAUI is concerned is there not a demarcation between recreational and technical. We are typing in the Technical Diving forum, which includes a bunch of Technical diving sub forums.

:idk:
It's like the difference between elementary school and secondary school ... you build on what you're previously learned. You don't just suspend all prior knowledge and learn something completely different ... it's a continuum.

Can a high-school algebra teacher explain arithmetic to a third-grader?

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
halemanō;6115014:
Has knowone claimed either he or I are the one's to give anybody deep diving advise? Or are we just attempting to put out a welcome mat for any contenders to the mantel of "true recreational expert" to step on and give "recreational" deep diving advise?

Hahaha. ROTFL. A recreational deep diving expert?

Is that the guy who does all of those deep dives without the benefit of having proper knowledge, skills or equipment for the dives he is doing?

We should start another thread with a parallel topic. One where we ask all the recreational penetration diving experts to give us their insights on how to do baby cave dives without the benefit of a reel or lights, without knowledge of gas planning for overhead environments and without knowing any of Sheck's 5 rules.

Hahahaha, you must have started your ROTFL before you read what you quoted!

Take a look at your wording, then take a look at my wording you quote, then take a look at my post above this one, then take a look at this. :mooner:

I'm pretty sure we have more than covered that subject somewhere in this collection;

http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/basic-scuba-discussions/369121-warped-view-dive-world.html

http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/ba...-world-vol-2-diving-beyond-your-training.html

http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/bu...ve-world-evolution-bp-w-subgroup-mindset.html

http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/ad...advanced-recreational-cavern-cave-diving.html
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom