DennisS
Contributor
As far as I recall in this long thread, it was speculation only that the diver might have had a stroke.
Yes, it was only speculation that she was a stroke victim
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
As far as I recall in this long thread, it was speculation only that the diver might have had a stroke.
I don't think it was suicide, I think she was struggling with a pre-existing condition that got much worse at the wrong time. It may be that she felt this might be her last chance ever to dive, her husband was concerned for her safety and they found a compromise in hiring a DM to be her buddy "just in case". From what I was told by a friend of hers, she rarely took no for an answer and her strength of personality was high.
Whether or not the DM acted appropriately is another matter.
Clarification: it IS speculation that she had a stroke on the dive, it is not speculation that she had a stroke in recent months.
I really hope we do not get into the whole debate again but miktsp....you need to remember that a DM should be equipped in such a manner that they can correct problems. A BC or wing with sufficient lift to get a troubled negative diver up is one and sufficient weight to keep a positive diver down is another.
Once you're at 140' descending fast you really need to start pushing air in fast to get back to neutrality because of the increasing bladder compaction with depth. It was mentioned that the DM was female and petite so she may well have have been diving a small female style BC with limited lift even when full.
Wow, I just managed to read through this whole tortuous thread.
One of the things that strikes me as a little strange is that various experienced posters made reference to "grab the tank valve and ascend with positive buoyancy".
This isn't always as easy as stated. It's quite probable that the DM had already deflated (at least partially) in order to swim down fast to the victim.
Once you're at 140' descending fast you really need to start pushing air in fast to get back to neutrality because of the increasing bladder compaction with depth. It was mentioned that the DM was female and petite so she may well have have been diving a small female style BC with limited lift even when full.
Over the years I've used BCs with extremely varying inflation rates when you press the inflator button and I've read various accident reports where divers who left inflation too late were unable to get enough air back into their BC fast enough to overcome increasing ambient pressure and continued to descend.
Those of us that regularly dive deeper know that you feed in air as you go down to control descent rate and don't let things get out of control.
Rescue courses are normally carried out at shallower depths where inflator flow rates are not so critical and reestablishing positive buoyancy at 60' or so or even starting with zero vertical velocity because you're both on the bottom is not an issue.
If you have a model of BC that has a limited to moderate inflator flow rate, reestablishing neutrality for 2 divers going down fast at 140' may well be impossible.
And just because you have a high capacity wing doesn't necessarily mean the inflator is correctly dimensioned for it. My large wing has the slowest inflator out of all those I've ever used. In contrast my BC that I use for most of my diving has a very high fill rate.