- Messages
- 16,424
- Reaction score
- 5,230
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
I agree with all you say--when it applies to ME, and divers with common sense. As I said, as a DM I have seen a select few taking OW with very little life experience in water. The odd one of those managed to squeeze through on skills and get certified. Some of those MAY dive 6 months later on a Wreck charter in the Great Lakes. I guess we just disagree that the captain was wrong in his advice. I agree with the post saying that he/she wouldn't want to give advice or "encouragement" that would contribute to an idiot's death. There are other ways to do it--such as "I encourage you to penetrate this wreck IF YOU ARE QUALIFIED and have the equipment--reel, line, lights, etc.-- to do so". Doesn't seem that hard to cover those bases. We do have seat belt laws everywhere (well, except NH). Those laws take into consideration idiots too (though I do disagree with them being actual laws).Hypotheticals and semantics on hearsay.
Encouragement.
That is one novice diver's perception of a pre-dive briefing.
If a DM said it's a nice wreck to penetrate, check it out, and if that qualifies as encouragement, and the DM goes on to describe the environment, all this is within the obvious context of each diver's experience and skill.
Don't want to penetrate? Don't. Don't want to go deep? Don't. Don't want to go solo? Don't.
This is not scuba theory; it's common sense.
If a diver does not know how to dive within their limits, they have no business being on a wreck dive in cold water with bad visibility.
No one is going to force a diver to do anything. You don't even have to get in the water if you don't want to.