Several posters have mentioned the possibility of regulator freeflows due to cold water. What keeps your pony reg from the same fate? Why not just use a sealed reg when diving in cold water?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I understand completely, and I'm not sure if I'm agreeing or disagreeing with you. I can't speak for others, so all I can say is that if I were to dive in the UK, I would use a twinset, not a pony, for the peace of mind. To me, those conditions are nothing to fool around with. A pony MIGHT work fine, IF one manages to tick all the boxes effectively: configuration, training, practice, etc. However, a twinset and a little training in dealing with failures is the more standard tool to deal with those conditions. That kind of training is so standardized and so widely available, why resort to a pony except to avoid the inconvenience/cost of a twinset? Sometimes, the kind of dives one wants to do just call for a little more inconvenience and cost.
You may be "more likely to see a pony" than a twinset, but should it be that way? Are some people simply taking the easier, less expensive route when the obvious tool for those conditions is the tried-and-true twinset configuration? You say that you are seeing more divers on twinsets and fewer divers on ponies. I would interpret that as meaning more divers are seeing the light and striving to dive these conditions with the better tool for the job, despite the cost and inconvenience.
Several posters have mentioned the possibility of regulator freeflows due to cold water. What keeps your pony reg from the same fate? Why not just use a sealed reg when diving in cold water?
Twinsets are not suitable for all divers, or for all dives. They require greater skill to use in a way that actually achieves the desired redunancy, they cost more, they weigh substantially more, they require more extensive equipment changes, there are dives where boat policy allows use of a pony but not a twinset, they increase drag, they complicate dive logistics.
Several posters have mentioned the possibility of regulator freeflows due to cold water. What keeps your pony reg from the same fate? Why not just use a sealed reg when diving in cold water?
Isn't that why you have cheap flights to the Red Sea and Thailand?
Several posters have mentioned the possibility of regulator freeflows due to cold water. What keeps your pony reg from the same fate? Why not just use a sealed reg when diving in cold water?
I know we have multiple threads about ponies.
Just an informal little survey after a recent chat with friends and observing other divers out at the quarry.
Do you see people diving with pony bottles?
Where I've dived - the local quarry and Lake Michigan - I see a fair number of divers with them. One fellow I've seen several times lately had a small - 13cft, maybe - pony that had a very nice marbled red finish.
Folks I dove with yesterday: 2 had 40cft ponies. I had my 30cft. One was SM.
Seems like the serious cold(er) water divers I know of tend to have them if they're diving single tank BM and carry them habitually even if in warmer water.
The warm water, vacation only divers I know have never seen another diver with one.