Another interesting report is at http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3936/12841609.pdf.
Flutter only, but interesting.
Flutter only, but interesting.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I have performed this test hundreds of times in my pool. Every time frog kick wins in speed and less muscle fatigue.
Have you got a link to this info? I would like to read it.
Thanks - MM
That's an interesting report. It's worth reading the "Discussion" on page 67 if nothing else. Thanks for posting.Another interesting report is at http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3936/12841609.pdf.
Flutter only, but interesting.
Although a previous study suggested that a fin that is too flexible or too rigid did not perform as well as a fin that was intermediate in rigidity (12). This was not supported by this study as the most rigid and most
flexible fin had similar performances.
Based on the physics of fin swimming using the Lighthill model (16, 17) and the VdotO2,
velocity and thrust data, it is clear that some fins have better performance (Attack, Apollo) than
other fins, however this can not be ascribed to a single fin characteristic. It is clear that the
venturis, vents, trauths, splits in the tested fins did not improve the performance of the fin.
The point of favoring the frog kick over the flutter kick does not have anything to do with efficiency. The frog kick tends to stir up far less silt from the bottom. Also using it, one is less likely to kick and damage the reef.
In most circumstances, divers need to swim in a slow and controlled fashion. There the frog kick is the choice.