Dry test shots with Canon S90/FIX housing.
Native 28mm, (this is the view as well that you would get with a dome port installed and underwater at 28mm):
Inon 100WAL Type II (with dome), camera set at 35mm:
Inon 165AD FE, camera set a 35mm:
Note, these shots are not intended to have proper exposure, they are simply to show potential lens compatibility and vignetting.
Note also that both of my Inon lenses are dome lenses and therefore they retain their surface FOV underwater and are not actually intended to work on the surface.
Note also that submerging wet lenses usually (seems to me) tends to further reduce distortions or vignetting since they are designed to operate wet.
Note shooting distance is approximately 18 inches, I may have sneaked forward by accident on the 165AD shot.
Note that there is no significant vignetting. These test shots indicate to me that there is no reason these lenses will not function satisfactorily with this rig if a well designed adapter is provided.
I hear it said often that with 28mm native lens cameras there is no advantage to using wet lenses especially if you must zoom to 35mm, I think these shots show this is not a truism.
Inon 100WAL with dome at 28mm/as an almost full fisheye framing:
Inon 100WAL with dome at 35mm in 4:3 framing, camera at nominal 35mm:
Canon S90 at 35mm equivalent, prime lens only, (note, this is the angle you would get approximately with a 28mm lens shooting through a flat port underwater):
OK, in this shot using the 100WAL with dome I took the circular image (from above) and cropped it to the standard 4:3 ratio in Photoshop, notice the similarity to the uncropped photo using the same lens but with the camera set to 35mm:
Inon 165AD FE at 28mm:
And one more with the Inon 165AD FE and the camera set at 35mm:
Note, every (all of them) shot above was taken with the Canon S90 camera installed into the FIX90 housing and the wet lens (when used) held, by hand, about 1/32 to 1/64 inches from the port.
N
Native 28mm, (this is the view as well that you would get with a dome port installed and underwater at 28mm):
Inon 100WAL Type II (with dome), camera set at 35mm:
Inon 165AD FE, camera set a 35mm:
Note, these shots are not intended to have proper exposure, they are simply to show potential lens compatibility and vignetting.
Note also that both of my Inon lenses are dome lenses and therefore they retain their surface FOV underwater and are not actually intended to work on the surface.
Note also that submerging wet lenses usually (seems to me) tends to further reduce distortions or vignetting since they are designed to operate wet.
Note shooting distance is approximately 18 inches, I may have sneaked forward by accident on the 165AD shot.
Note that there is no significant vignetting. These test shots indicate to me that there is no reason these lenses will not function satisfactorily with this rig if a well designed adapter is provided.
I hear it said often that with 28mm native lens cameras there is no advantage to using wet lenses especially if you must zoom to 35mm, I think these shots show this is not a truism.
Inon 100WAL with dome at 28mm/as an almost full fisheye framing:
Inon 100WAL with dome at 35mm in 4:3 framing, camera at nominal 35mm:
Canon S90 at 35mm equivalent, prime lens only, (note, this is the angle you would get approximately with a 28mm lens shooting through a flat port underwater):
OK, in this shot using the 100WAL with dome I took the circular image (from above) and cropped it to the standard 4:3 ratio in Photoshop, notice the similarity to the uncropped photo using the same lens but with the camera set to 35mm:
Inon 165AD FE at 28mm:
And one more with the Inon 165AD FE and the camera set at 35mm:
Note, every (all of them) shot above was taken with the Canon S90 camera installed into the FIX90 housing and the wet lens (when used) held, by hand, about 1/32 to 1/64 inches from the port.
N
Last edited: