MikeFerrara once bubbled...
As I see it is too many aren't tought the theory.
I'm not an instuctor, but man, did that ever hit the nail square on the head. And that goes for whole gamut, not just buoyancy & trim.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
MikeFerrara once bubbled...
As I see it is too many aren't tought the theory.
MikeFerrara once bubbled...
The principals I teach for adjusting balance to obtain correct trim will work with any equipment it will just take a little more effort. Learning this process better prepares one to dive regardless of equipment. A BP lends itself well to the process. As I see it is too many aren't tought the theory.
How do your students do?
Have you tried teaching with a plate as well as a bc?
How do you teach trim?
How were you tought trim?
I have and even if I am unable to quantify the benefits well in writting the results have been fantastic.
Popeye once bubbled...
They do fine. They can hover and maintain a depth. They have to do a barrel roll (I don't know why) but they also have to do a 360 and maintain.
No. For the reasons stated, we feel it's a safety issue. I suspect that if a student bought a backplate, we'd let them do OW in it (since that would be his norm), but the situation has never arisen.
We have overheads and a classroom stint, and then we weight and balance each diver horizontally in the pool, while the other divers watch. We explain various methods of trim weighting, and buoyancy characteristics of different gear (fins, ankle weights, tank weights, ect).
In OW, by tank shifting and a tank weight or two.
I learned to dive over a reef, and knew that landing on it was uncool.