Shas once bubbled...
Okay there seems some mis-conceptions in how the PRISM is configured and operates so here goes;
No, the PRISM has it's single 9v battery (get it at any 7/11 or corner store) in a seperate battery compartment OUTSIDE the breathing loop. You flood the battery compartment - your flying manually, but your still CCR constant PO2.
The PRISM secondary reads all the sensors, it doesn't need a battery to operate. On systems with battery driven backups it is true you have a secondary source, however we have found over the last decade that this causes more problems than it solves as a damaged cable, flooded connector or flooded display renders the sensors useless as they are either been driven by the 6, 12 or 24 v battery supply which completely stuffs them or the Po2 indicated is batte
y leakage voltage across damaged connector,circuit board or what ever which looks like very high Po2's on the display. So not using a battery means only small mV involved. So access to raw sensor data is achieved even when the unit is heavily damaged or electronics flooded because we can turn the system OFF. Obviously if the canister is swamped its all over anyway but typicaly its the peripherals that get whacked and flooded.
I never said the prism's battery was in the loop, I just stated, maybe not in the clearest terms.. a flood serious enough to flood the inspiration battery compartment, would take out the sensors in all likelihood, the same type flood probably would also take out sensors in the prism (although the battery may still be intact, it would be useless without sensors).. Its not very easy getting water in the batteries.. there is no oring but the compartment seals fairly tight.. its more likely that a serious SALT water flood woud cause a battery drain from the wiring below the compartment.
Shas once bubbled...
Interesting numbers but there is no mention of water temp, gas density, scrubber grain size, depth, RMV etc. etc. The duration you quoted was for the 5.4 lb PRISM scrubber, the 6lb scubber you reference gives 300 minutes or 5 hours under USN test standards - look at the SMI website
http://www.steammachines.com/PDFs/TM01-03.pdf
[/B]
The Inspiration tests are rated at 4 degress Centigrade instead of 4.5 (for your tests), The warmer water yours was tested in in theory should yield slightly better numbers, probably in all liklihood neglidgeable...
8-12 mesh, no ratings were done on 4-8 mesh
No it is not smoke and mirrors - the bottom line is the PRISM with full cylinders, full 6lb scrubber ready to dive is 47lbs and has a considerably longer dive duration and much less work of breathing, these are facts as can be verified by the publicly available test data. In the FL Springs, 8lbs of lead is needed in the counterlungs (4 either side) which makes a total unit weight of 55lbs - still less than the Inspiration on the desk. If you wish to use steel cylinders the PRISM can utilise anything up to 7ltr 300 bar steels without customisation.
ok 55 lbs, if you change it to 3l steels as in the inspiration add about 12 lbs, thats now 67 lbs..
You didn't specify wet or dry, but in my drysuit with heavy underwear I use 4-6lbs in salt water, less in fresh water, this brings the equipped inspiration to about 70 lbs... pretty close to me....
I'm not trying to bash, just trying to give clear comparisons oranges vs oranges, as neutral as possible..
I did say in my message I would reserve judgement until I saw another diver use the rig.. I wouldn't base it solely on 1 diver, who may not have been capable to do the delicate adjustments in calibration or maintanance..
The Inspiration may have been more up his alley since everything is done digitally, and the seals are dummy proof(as long as they are present)..
my main complaint with the prism has always been the lack of user changeable setpoints underwater, I understand why you chose that path, but for an experienced user, I'd like to have the option to control the setpoints (Peter told me it can me done with different handsets).. When I dive at sunset house a fixed setpoint (after 18 fsw)would be a real pain in the A**.. its over 300 yards to the wall.. once you get to the wall you can do a fast drop if your po2 isn't that high... I will typically run at a 1.00 and control my PO2 with my descent rate.. once I'm at depth I'll bump it to a 1.3.. If I'm already at the high setpooint at start of the wall at 80 fsw, dropping to 200 or 300 fsw would take forever without lots of Dil flushing.., either that or use a lower setpoint and fly the whole dive manually..
I don't know how true the following statement is, but I was told the unit must use 100% oxygen, there is no compensation available..
There are 2 potential problems here 1) you get oxygen from PSA systems when traveling... 92-96% is common, now if there is no compensation you can always calibrate and figure out what the content is for a given display...
(This is purely an example I did not do any calculations because I'd have to take ambient pressure into account- its illustrative only)
if the controller was indicating 1.4 the loop may actually be 1.3 or lower..
If you dive at altitude, without compensation the numbers really get skewed..
at 6000ft 100% oxygen at the surface would only yield a .8 po2
Who knows, with the expected price increases, I may end up not even dealing with the Inspiration in the future...
No RB is perfect for everyone.. just look at my current unit.. It doesn't look like an inspiration anymore.. its totally custom for my needs.. it comes in at approx 110lbs with full independent integrated bailout. My hoses and cannister are heavily protected, My only real concern in all likelihood is probably only scrubber breakthorugh, which shouldn't be a problem when staying within limits. There is much longer duration canister in the works by a third part, so thats my next swap out..
If an Inspiration owner was really concerned with travel weight, it could be dropped significantly..
1st get rid of the brass manifold and use standard hoses.. The manifold makes hose routing very neat but is not an absolute necessary and is heavy..
2nd get rid of the Apeks regs.. they are great regs, but are vastly more than is needed (for CCR diving) but they were probably chosen for the onboard bailout which must meet specific CE breathing requirements.. they also weigh a ton... switch to simple scubapro regs like you have done..
3rd change the clips on the shell with spring loaded clips that allow a longer throw so aluminum cylinders will fit.. AL 19s are just slightly too large in diameter to easily fit.. The case can be used as is but its very tricky getting everything to fit.
4th get rid of the brass SPGs and go with a lighter guage..I personally like the large original guages, but they are even heavier than the current ones..