USD environment chamber silicone fluid (Conshelf series regs)

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Sounds like a cool experiment... might raise a few eyebrows though at the pharmacy when you step out with all that lube :eyebrow:

Reminds me of the Louie C.K. sketch of the TSA finding his personal lube prior to boarding his flight. Y'all are too much.
 
Just a fast update, Both samples had " NO " effect on the o-rings.. There was no swelling as checked with a mic and also comparing them with a control group.... The pull test also went well with no change noted... So, It's off to test the fluids in the conshelf supreme... I'll service the 1st stages and just do a function test this weekend after the dives I'll remove the seal to just have a look-see... At the end of diving in October i'll do a full overhaul and post the outcome...

Jim....
 
Captain,

I don't think anyone got your joke in putting up this MSDS. I just read this thread today, and think it is hilarious, but then again I am a safety professional and industrial hygienist too.

Personally, I won't let any silicone touch my gear unless it is food-quality. And I won't use any ethylene glycol or propylene glycol as these can be respiratory hazards. Also, the family of glycol ethers are mutagens.

Implications of IBM Study on Miscarriages : Workplace: The two chemicals involved have a wide range of uses. But computer companies are downplaying the significance of the report. - Los Angeles Times

SeaRat


SeaRat


SeaRat,

Can you comment on the safety of using PTFE based greases in regulators?

I have heard some concerns about these compounds being used in non-stick cookware and other products. It seems there is a very high probability that whatever lubricant is used in a first stage will have particulates become entrained in the high velocity air stream and therefore be ingested by the diver.
 
SeaRat,

Can you comment on the safety of using PTFE based greases in regulators?

I have heard some concerns about these compounds being used in non-stick cookware and other products. It seems there is a very high probability that whatever lubricant is used in a first stage will have particulates become entrained in the high velocity air stream and therefore be ingested by the diver.
Six2Life,

I just sent his e-mail to the manufacturer:

"Can you please send me the MSDS for Super-Lube? We have a diver who is about to use this on his regulator as an anti-freeze agent. So it would be helpful to know if there is any potential toxic effect.

"John


"John C. Ratliff, CSP, CIH, MSPH"

I'll have more info after I receive the MSDS.

SeaRat



---------- Post Merged at 07:20 PM ---------- Previous Post was at 12:41 PM ----------

Here are a couple of MSDSs to look at. I'll comment later (I did not receive these from the manufacturer, but from an on-line search).
http://www.skcinc.com/instructions/1792.pdf

http://buysuperlube.com/msds/MSDS_SL_PTFE_Oil.pdf

More after supper.

John

---------- Post Merged at 08:44 PM ---------- Previous Post was at 12:41 PM ----------

Six4Life,

Looking at a product is a rather complex affair. Usually, I won't comment on a product until I have seen the MSDS, and even then only after I know the ingredients (sometimes they are proprietary, and that makes it difficult). In this case, the "Super Lube Oil w/PFTA" MSDS has the information I need to make some decisions. These are difficult to interpert unless a person has a background in industrial hygiene, as there are concepts which are not well understood outside the safety and industrial hygiene professions. Here is the ingredient information from this MSDS:

SuperLubeIngredientsfromMSDS.jpg


You will note immediately that there are six ingredients to be concerned about for human exposure. Of these, there are three which have ACGIH TLVs. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) updates their Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) every year according to the information that has been developed through toxicology studies. The TLV is the level of a chemical that the majority of people can be exposed to 8 hours a day, five days a week for a working lifetime without undue effect (the actual definition takes over a page, so this is the shortened version).

So there are three chemicals here which have a TLV,and these are actually for:

"Mineral oil, excluding metal workng fluids (2009)
Pure, highly and severely refined 5 mg/m3
Poorly and mildly refined ---(L)

"(L) Exposures by all routes should be carefully controlled to levels as low as possible."

The term, mg/m3 is the amount, in milligrams that are in a cubic meter of air that is breathed. The term TWA means "Time-Weighted Average" and refers to the amount sampled/unit time as if it were an 8-hour time-weighted average.

Note that PTFE has a "non-established" note. There are many chemicals which have no TLVs, and that does not mean that they present no hazard; just that the toxicology and the need for a TLV has not been established. Also, OSHA PELs (Permissible Exposure Limits) are built on the same definition, but have not been updated since the 1980s due to court action. So we look to other sources. Believe it or not, Wikipedia is one source (but not a primary source) for this information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytetrafluoroethylene

Basically, from what I can tell the problems with PTFE are only when it is heated and breaks down, and then the off-gasping byproducts can cause flu-like symptoms. I have an acquaintance who was a cook, and he stated that any cookware he had that had PTFEs as a coating would be tossed as soon as the coating was compromised (cut or nicked) because of this effect. However, my wife has had this on her wok, and we have worn it completely off without effects on our health to my knowledge. So this aspect of the Super Lube is not a concern, from my perspective.

The one component I have a concern with is the "fumed silica". Silica is pretty nasty stuff, but apparently this is not the crystalline silica with a very low TLV (0.025 mg/m3). Amorphous silica (which is what apparently "fumed silica" starts as is not as highly toxic as the crystalline silica. That 10% of this mixture is fumed silica is a concern for me if they are in a life-support system such as a demand regulator.

Now, let's talk about the regulator. This is a Conshelf, which is a balanced diaphragm regulator. The diaphragm means that the exterior (water) contact is totally isolated from the interior air flow. If this regulator is equipped with an environmental unit, the material used in the environmental unit (for the first stage) is isolated from the air, and not much of a concern during use. But if this regulator was instead a flow-through piston-style regulator, where the environmental agent (silicone grease, or something experimental) was used, it is possible for the lubricant to get into the air as lubricant can bypass the O-rings and get into the interior air. This would be a problem for this Super Lube w/PTFE.

The TLVs cannot be directly used to discuss hazards in diving, as the amount in the air cannot be sampled or calculated, and all this in dependent on STP (standard temperature and pressure). At incleased pressure, you cannot the TLVs do not hold.

This is not a recommended use of this lubricant:

Potential Health Effects
Inhalation: Not expected to cause respiratory tract irritation during
normal conditions of use.
Skin contact: Repeated or prolonged contact may be irritating to skin.
Eye contact: Contact with eyes may cause irritation.
Ingestion: Not expected under normal conditions of use.

This is why I am very particular about the type of materials I put on my regulator.

John (SeaRat)

John C. Ratliff, CSP, CIH, MSPH
 
Last edited:
So does this mean i should end my sex lube testing???? And I want to know what part of this thread Vintage hose thinks is silly???? I just might like having the "1st stage lube for after dive time...
:rofl3:
Jim
 
Oldschoolto,

I was commenting only on the SuperLube with PTFD. It seems that the sex lube is different. But realize that there are different "routes of entry" into the body, and while a substance may be okay for skin contact, you might not want to inhale it. The Conshelf, as I said, pretty much precludes getting the lube into the air stream. However, my Scubapro Balanced Flow-through Piston first stage may not be a good candidate.

SeaRat
 
John. I did not think you were.... i don't think that ANY silicone based fluids would be healthy in a mist/ vapor form to inhale...That said... I really didn't think the brake fluid or the super lube were even in the running for a replacement fluid in the 1st stage... As far as the prices... The personal lubes are very pricey and I don't think the conshelf fluid is going to be that far off in cost....

Jim
 
SeaRat, thanks for the detailed response.

However, my Scubapro Balanced Flow-through Piston first stage may not be a good candidate.

SeaRat

This, in my mind, seems to be much more of a concern that the Conshelf env fluid. I have seen the inside of a MK20 that had a significant amount out christo/tribolube that had been pulled through the piston stem and had pretty thoroughly coated the top of the piston in the IP chamber. I am sure some of this lubricant had become picked up by the gas and delivered to the diver.

Aren't christolube and tribolube PTFE based?
 
The US Divers Conshelf XIV Supreme, uses Dow Corning Silicone oil Type DC200/100CS.
It's written on the US Divers Conshelf XIV drawings,

Three years with this post and were still not there, Give me strength.

Its a cheap silicone $8 a pound sold all over the world.
I quote:

Dow Corning 200 Fluids are Polydimethysiloxanes of different viscosities. They are available in a wide range of viscosities (from 0.6 to 60,000mm²sª¹).
High viscosities provide better protection while lower viscosities provide easier application and emulsification.Applications: An ingredient in protective creams, skin lotions, hand creams, waterless hand cleaners, vanishing creams, suntan lotions, aerosol shave lathers,
makeup, shampoos, toilet soaps, antiperspirants and many other common preparations:

  • 50 and 100mm²sª¹ viscosities: skin protection with a light touch, generally used where smooth feel and softness are required. Easier to emulsify than the 350mm²sª¹ viscosity fluid.
  • 350mm²sª¹ viscosity: for protective hand lotions and cream formulations. Properly formulated it leaves no trace of stickiness and gives excellent water repellency.
Features

  • Hydrophobicity
  • Reduced surface tension
  • Allows skin transpiration
  • Good rub-out
  • Fungi and bacteria resistant
  • Non-sensitising
  • Thermally stable
  • Resistant to oxidation

If in doubt ask your wife she probably has a bathroom full of the stuff. Iain Middlebrook
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom